NEW DELHI: In a shocking and dramatic flip of occasions, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud was stunned on Friday as two whiskey bottles had been prominently displayed through the listening to of a trademark violation dispute between two liquor corporations.
What Was The Matter?
The three-judge bench, led by CJI Chandrachud, was actively engaged in listening to an attraction difficult the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s choice, which rejected the attraction of Pernod Ricard’s, a liquor firm. The attraction aimed to restrain Indore-based JK Enterprises from manufacturing alcoholic drinks below the model title ‘London Pride.’
As the authorized proceedings commenced, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi made an uncommon request to introduce alcohol into the courtroom for demonstration functions. After receiving approval, Rohatgi introduced in two whiskey bottles, initiating a novel dialogue through the ongoing authorized arguments.
The sudden show of whiskey bottles amused Chief Justice Chandrachud, who, together with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra, shared a second of laughter and requested, “Have you brought bottles with you?”
Responding to the curious inquiry, Rohatgi clarified that he meant to reveal equality between the 2 whiskey bottles and proceeded to elaborate on how the trademark violation had transpired on this explicit case.
Insight Into The Trade Dress Issue
In response to Rohatgi’s clarification, the Chief Justice remarked, “The issue here is about the trade dress. In one of my decisions in Bombay, this aspect was considered, which included the size of the bottle.”
Following this change, the bench took a major step by issuing a discover, placing a keep on the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order. An in depth listening to was scheduled two weeks later to delve into the intricacies of the case. Post-notice issuance, Rohatgi sought permission from the CJI to retain the whiskey bottles, to which the Chief Justice, with a smile, replied, “Yes, please.”
(*2*)Source hyperlink
