SC Transfers 3 FIRs Lodged Against Pawan Khera To Lucknow, Extends Bail till April 10

0
19
SC Transfers 3 FIRs Lodged Against Pawan Khera To Lucknow, Extends Bail till April 10


New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday clubbed three FIRs lodged towards Congress chief Pawan Khera in Assam and Uttar Pradesh for allegedly making objectionable remarks towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi and transferred the matter to the Hazratganj police station in Lucknow whereas extending his interim bail to April 10.

Khera will likely be at liberty to use for normal bail earlier than the jurisdictional court docket in Lucknow, a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud stated. “We order and direct that the FIRs registered at Police Station Cantt at Varanasi and at PS Halflong in Assam shall stand transferred to Police Station Hazratganj.

The ad-interim order (of interim bail) which was handed by this court docket on February 23, 2023 (prolonged by the orders dated February 27, March 3) shall be prolonged for the additional interval till April 10,” the bench, additionally having Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala, stated.

The apex court docket, occasionally, had been extending the interim bail of Khera who was arrested by the Assam Police on February 23 in connection along with his alleged remarks towards Modi made at a press convention in Mumbai on February 17.

The Congress spokesperson was arrested from the Delhi airport after he was de-boarded from a airplane that was imagined to take him to Raipur. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, referring to the rejoinder filed by Khera, alleged that the chief himself has not tendered an unconditional apology and in rejoinder, he stated that he did no unsuitable.

“Even after the Lordships’ order, the official deal with of the get together (Congress) to which petitioner belongs has saved on tweeting the identical factor which mustn’t have occurred. It has by no means occurred previously within the Indian political discourse. An individual who shouldn’t be a part of public life is maligned like this,? the regulation officer stated, including that Khera should management such actions of his get together.

“During the course of the listening to, the counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that the petitioner stands by the unconditional apology which was tendered on behalf of the petitioner by Dr A M Singhvi, who appeared on February 23,? the bench famous in its order, including that it’ll go by the apology tendered by the senior lawyer representing Khera.

Of the three FIRs, two have been lodged on the Cantonment police station in Varanasi and the Hazratganj police station in Lucknow. The third FIR was lodged in Assam. The solicitor basic stated that he has no downside with clubbing the FIRs and that they are often clubbed and transferred to Assam for investigation and subsequent trial.

“The first FIR is at Lucknow. The follow is to membership it to the place the place the primary FIR was registered,? the bench noticed. The counsel, showing for Khera, sought an adjournment saying that senior lawyer Singhvi was not obtainable and the case be listed for listening to subsequent Monday as they wished it to be transferred to Delhi to make sure a good trial within the matter.

The bench rejected the submissions and went forward to determine and eliminate Khera’s plea. Earlier, the Assam and Uttar Pradesh governments, of their separate affidavits, opposed Khera’s plea looking for clubbing of FIRs lodged towards him, claiming that his get together was nonetheless persevering with with the “very same low level” on their social media accounts.

The Uttar Pradesh authorities had sought dismissal of the plea with a value by terming it “misconceived” and “an attempt to leapfrogging the routine procedure available under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)”.

“It is submitted that the leaders of the political party (Congress) to which the petitioner (Khera) belongs have, even after this hon’ble court taking cognizance of the matter, continued the very same low level in their official Twitter handles and other social media accounts,” the Assam authorities had stated.

Khera obtained bail from a magisterial court docket right here on February 23 after the CJI-led bench granted him interim bail throughout an pressing listening to earlier within the day. “In order to enable the petitioner (Khera) to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court, upon the FIRs being transferred to one jurisdiction, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on interim bail by the court of the competent magistrate at Delhi where he is to be produced this evening,” the apex court docket had stated.

“The above order shall remain in operation till February 28,” it had stated. The apex court docket had issued notices to Assam and Uttar Pradesh, looking for their responses on Khera’s plea for transferring and clubbing collectively three separate FIRs lodged towards him within the two states.

After dictating the order, the CJI had apparently expressed his displeasure over Khera’s remarks and noticed: “We have protected you (Khera), but there has to be some level of discourse.”

Singhvi, showing for Khera, had stated the phrases taken at their face worth, as mirrored within the FIRs, don’t set up any offense punishable beneath the sections invoked. He additionally advised the apex court docket that Khera had already apologized for his remarks and that the offenses alleged towards him within the circumstances didn’t require arrest.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, showing for the state of Assam, had performed the offending video within the court docket and claimed that Khera’s assertion on Modi was a “deliberate attempt to denigrate a constitutional functionary”.

(*3*)



Source hyperlink