Google Wins US Patent Trial Over Data Retrieval on Pixel Phones, Apps

0
48
Google Wins US Patent Trial Over Data Retrieval on Pixel Phones, Apps


Alphabet’s Google LLC received a jury trial on Tuesday in a long-running patent lawsuit in Delaware federal court docket over options in Google’s smartphones and apps.

The jury determined that Luxembourg-based patent proprietor Arendi SARL’s patent was invalid and that Google didn’t infringe it, based on the decision made public on Wednesday.

Attorneys for Arendi didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. Google spokesperson José Castañeda mentioned the corporate was happy with the choice and appreciated the jury’s “careful attention to the extensive evidence presented in this case.”

Norwegian inventor Atle Hedloy’s Arendi sued Google in 2013 over the patent, which pertains to retrieving info like names and addresses from a database and getting into it into phrase processors and spreadsheets.

Arendi alleged that Google’s cellular units and apps together with Gmail, Chrome, Docs, and Messages infringed. It requested the court docket for $45.5 million (roughly Rs. 37 crore) in damages, based on a spokesperson for Google’s legislation agency Paul Hastings.

The jury decided that Google didn’t infringe Arendi’s patent and agreed with Google’s argument that the patent was invalid primarily based on earlier publications that disclosed the identical invention.

Arendi has additionally sued different tech corporations together with Apple, Microsoft, and Samsung Electronics over associated patents. Those instances have all been dismissed or resolved. 

© Thomson Reuters 2023 


The Vivo X90 Pro has lastly made its debut in India, however is the corporate’s flagship smartphone for 2023 outfitted with sufficient upgrades over its predecessor? We talk about this and extra on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is accessible on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.
Affiliate hyperlinks could also be robotically generated – see our ethics assertion for particulars.



Source hyperlink