New Delhi: BJP has revived the previous energy tussle between the Aam Aadmi Party authorities and the Lieutenant governor by proposing the federal government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2021 in Lok Sabha. The Bill offers discretionary powers to the L-G of Delhi even in issues the place the Legislative Assembly of Delhi is empowered to make legal guidelines.
While the AAP Government and L-G have at loggerheads since Kejriwal’s social gathering was elected in Delhi for the second time the matter was taken up by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, which tilted the scales in favour of the elected authorities by way of its July 4, 2018 verdict.
The Delhi Chief Minister reacted on Twitter after the NCT Bill 2021 was proposed within the Lok Sabha accusing the BJP of in search of to drastically curtail the powers of his elected authorities in Delhi by way of a brand new invoice.
The Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia stated that if the proposed amendments to The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 are handed, elections and the elected authorities in Delhi will turn out to be meaningless.
Opposition events have are available favour of the Kejriwal authorities over the NCT Bill calling it to be ‘unconstitutional.
National Conference chief Omar Abdullah on Monday prolonged his assist to the Delhi authorities regardless of the AAP supporting the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019.
“In spite of AAP’s support for the dismemberment & downgrading of J&K in 2019, we still condemn this assault on the powers of the elected government of Delhi. Delhi deserves to be a full state with all powers exercised by the elected government & not a nominated LG,” Omar Abdullah tweeted.
Congress senior chief Kapil Sibal additionally took to Twitter and stated that the National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2021 violates the federal construction of the structure.
What is the NCT 2021 Bill?
In the “statement of objects and reasons” part, the Centre claims that the modification Bill seeks to present impact to the Supreme Court’s interpretation and that it “further defines” the tasks of the elected authorities and the Lt Governor according to the Constitutional scheme. Among the foremost proposed amendments, one makes it explicitly clear that the time period “government” in any legislation made by the Legislative Assembly shall imply the L-G. This, basically, offers impact to former L-G Najeeb Jung’s 2015 assertion that “Government means the Lieutenant Governor of the NCT of Delhi appointed by the President under Article 239 and designated as such under Article 239 AA of the Constitution”. The Bill provides that the L-G’s opinion shall be obtained earlier than the federal government takes any government motion primarily based on choices taken by the Cabinet or any particular person minister.
It additionally said the legislative meeting shall not make any rule to allow itself or its committees to think about the issues of the day-to-day administration of the nationwide capital or conduct inquiries in relation to the executive choices.
The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2021, launched by Minister of State for Home G Kishan Reddy, proposes to amend 4 clauses of the 1991 Act.
What are the amendments proposed within the 1991 act?
-
‘Government’ to imply ‘Lieutenant Governor’
The first is in Section 21, “Restrictions on laws passed by Legislative Assembly with respect to certain matters”. The Bill seeks so as to add a subsection making it clear that the “expression ‘Government’ referred to in any law to be made by the Legislative Assembly shall mean the Lieutenant Governor”.
The second modification is sought in Section 24, which offers with assent to Bills handed by the Legislative Assembly. The modification seeks so as to add that the L-G is not going to assent to and go on to the President for consideration any Bill which “incidentally covers any of the matters which falls outside the purview of the powers conferred on the Legislative Assembly”.
-
Limiting the executive powers of the Delhi Legislative Assembly
Third, the Bill needs so as to add in Section 33 (“Rules of procedure”) that guidelines made by the Assembly for regulating its process and conduct of enterprise shall not be “inconsistent with the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in House of People”.
Provided that the Legislative Assembly shall not make any rule to allow itself or its Committees to think about the issues of day-to-day administration of the Capital or conduct inquiries in relation to the executive choices, and any of the rule made in contravention of this proviso, earlier than the graduation of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2021, shall be void”, reads Section 5 of the bill.
-
Compulsory to take the opinion of L-G
Section 5 of the Bill seeks to add a provision to Section 44 of the 1991 Act (dealing with ‘conduct of business’), which makes it compulsory for the government to obtain the opinion of the Lieutenant Governor on all matters, before taking any ‘executive action’.
As it stands, Section 44 (2) of the Act states,
“Save as in any other case supplied on this Act, all government motion of Lieutenant Governor whether or not taken on the advise of his Ministers or in any other case shall be expressed to be taken within the identify of the Lieutenant Governor.”
To this, Section 5 of the invoice seeks so as to add the next proviso:
“Provided that earlier than taking any government motion in pursuance of the choice of the Council of Ministers or a Minister, to train powers of Government, State Government, Appropriate Government, Lieutenant Governor, Administrator or Chief Commissioner, because the case could also be, beneath any legislation in pressure within the Capital, the opinion of Lieutenant Governor in time period of the proviso to clause (4) of Article 239AA of the Constitution shall be obtained on all such issues as could also be specified, by a basic or particular order, by Lieutenant Governor.”
What happens if the Bill is passed and why is the state government objecting?
According to the proposed amendments in the NCT Bill, the state government will have to send files on executive matters to the L-G before the implementation of any decision. The Delhi government has been keeping the L-G abreast of all administrative developments, but not necessarily before implementing or executing any decision. But the amendment, if cleared, will force the elected government to take the L-G’s advice before taking any action on any cabinet decision.
The Bill seeks to add a provision in the original GNCTD Act, 1991, barring the Assembly or its committees from making rules to take up matters concerning day-to-day administration, or to conduct inquiries in relation to administrative decisions.
The Aam Aadmi Party-led Delhi government has on many occasions challenged the BJP-ruled Central government regarding administrative matters in the Capital. From 2015 to 2018, the AAP government was engaged in a constant battle with the Centre over policy decisions and the powers of the L-G but the Supreme Court gave a verdict in 2018 favouring the Delhi government after which the Kejriwal ministers stopped sending files to L-G.
What was SC’s 2018 verdict?
In its 2018 verdict, the five-judge Bench had held that the L-G’s concurrence is not required on issues other than police, public order, and land. It had added that decisions of the Council of Ministers will, however, have to be communicated to the L-G. “It has to be clearly stated that requiring the prior concurrence of the Lieutenant Governor would absolutely negate the ideals of representative governance and democracy conceived for the NCT of Delhi by Article 239AA of the Constitution,” the court had ruled. The L-G was bound by the aid and advice of the council of ministers, it had said.
The constitutional bench said that the L-G was the “administrative head but can’t act as an obstructionist cannot” and “interfere in every decision of the Delhi government”.
While the separation of powers of the L-G and the chief minister was fairly delineated by the Supreme Court judgment. The matters related to the services remained unresolved. The matter is still to be concluded in the Supreme Court.
In this background, the Centre has brought the NCT Bill to demarcate the powers of the L-G and the elected government of Delhi.
