Why It Matters | Scams in scientific publishing

An e mail has allegedly accused a knowledge scientist, Gunasekaran Manogaran, of being an instrumental a part of a analysis paper publication rip-off and tarnishing the status of eminent scientific publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, Taylor and Francis and Wiley.
| Photo Credit: istock.com

What is it? An e mail by a whistleblower has accused a scientist named Gunasekaran Manogaran of being an instrumental a part of a analysis paper publication rip-off and tarnishing the status of eminent scientific publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, Taylor and Francis and Wiley, Undarkreported. 

The author of the e-mail has alleged that the rip-off targets a particular kind of publication known as ‘special editions’, the place a specific challenge of a scientific journal focuses on a single theme or subject. These self-contained editions should not a part of the journal’s common publishing schedule. Typically, particular points have been used to focus on a specific subject or discover totally different avenues of current analysis. They have additionally been helpful to publishers as a income as researchers are extremely charged to get their papers revealed in these open-access points. 

Special points are usually managed by ‘guest editors’ who should not direct staff of the publishers. Most of the time, they’re approached by the editors of the journal to curate the particular editions. Researchers can even suggest a subject for a particular version to the writer.

What is the context?

• According to Undark’s report, the e-mail alleged that the organisers of the rip-off used a web site to take bulk orders from researchers in international locations like China and Taiwan, the place researchers are underneath strain to publish increasingly papers.
• Then, the organisers would allegedly contact tons of of scientific journals and suggest subjects for particular editions. 
• If a journal accepted a subject, the organisers would allegedly appoint considered one of their very own members as a visitor editor. 
• This method, in keeping with the report, the organisers had the ability to jot down and reply to peer-reviews in addition to to quote their very own work, with none exterior scrutiny.
• In latest years, there was a rise in fraudulent analysis publications from India as properly. Last yr, an investigation was launched right into a June 2021 paper coauthored, amongst others, by Ranga Dias, following allegations of knowledge manipulation.
• This month, one other investigation known as into query the exceptionally excessive rating of Saveetha Dental College in Chennai which allegedly engaged in an unethical follow known as excessive self-citation to spice up its quotation rating.

Also Read | How faux science web sites hijack our belief in specialists to misinform and confuse

Why does it matter?

• According to Undark, there are at the very least 60 such problematic particular points which can be nonetheless on-line, and which have been edited or authored by researchers who have been related to this mill.
• The report additionally stated that analysis revealed in these journals was usually of low high quality, with questionable information produced by researchers whose scientific credentials have been in query.
• These sorts of scams erode individuals’s belief in science and hinder analysis into issues of public well being resembling most cancers therapy, Covid-19 vaccine and drug growth, impartial specialists quoted by Undark stated.
• The presence of such low-quality papers in the science literature additionally lowers the latter’s high quality and reliability, they added.