Explained: Richard Kettleborough’s Controversial Decision To Not Award A Wide Off Nasum Ahmed When Virat Kohli Was On 97

It was 4 wins in 4 matches for India and the forty eighth ODI century for talisman batter Virat Kohli, who put up a dominant 103* off 96 balls to steer India clear forward of Bangladesh within the ICC Cricket World Cup in Pune.

Kohli’s knock was nothing wanting sensational. A pure basic within the making. Openers Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill each put up a stable partnership to begin off the run chase. But, as all the time, it was the run-machine, the grasp of the chase, who got here into the crease and took over your complete recreation.

READ: A Virat Kohli Hundred Which Felt Different

Kohli’s innings was carved out with aggressive intent and pure craftmanship with the bat as Virat didn’t fumble for a mere second all through the whole thing of his innings. Laced with chic straight drives, thumping pull pictures and his signature cowl drives galore, Kohli put up 97 runs on the board in fast succession as India had been properly on their solution to seize yet one more victory.

With India two runs away from a win over Bangladesh of their ICC Cricket World Cup 2023 match in Pune on Friday, Bangladesh spinner Nasum Ahmed fired the primary supply of the forty second over down the leg-side.

Virat Kohli, who was batting on 97, was left irritated with the supply as he left it alone. The umpire Richard Kettleborough didn’t sign it as broad although, held a smirk on his face as his arms stayed in place.

Afterwards, the choice hadn’t gone down properly with a number of customers on social media, arguing that it was infact Kettleborough who deliberately allowed Kohli to get his elusive third World Cup century.

However, upon nearer inspection, one can see that it’s additionally potential {that a} change to the Laws of Cricket in 2022, which was truly introduced in to assist bowlers, that performed a component in serving to Kohli final evening.

In truth, a press release launched by the MCC themselves in March 2022 acknowledged, “In the modern game, batters are, more than ever, moving laterally around the crease before the ball is bowled.

“It was felt unfair that a delivery might be called ‘Wide’ if it passes where the batter had stood as the bowler entered his/her delivery stride.

“Therefore, Law 22.1 has been amended so that a Wide will apply to where the batter is standing, where the striker has stood at any point since the bowler began their run up, and which would also have passed wide of the striker in a normal batting position.”

ICC World Cup: Schedule | Results | Points Table | Most Runs | Most Wickets

So, as per the newly proposed rule change, Nasum’s supply would have been referred to as a large if it was to be identified that the ball wouldn’t are available in contact with Kohli, who took his stance throughout the leg facet because the bowler got here in for the supply, and any a part of his physique.

But, given the broad open stance that Kohli assumed proper as Nasum got here charging in for his supply, it might have been calculated by Kettleborough that that the supply could have are available in contact with Kohli, if it weren’t for all of the lateral motion Virat includes in on the crease. And therefore, this can be a motive behind why the supply was not referred to as for a large.