For all investigations, tax officers have been requested to establish if any inquiry has already been initiated on the identical subject material or with respect to the identical taxpayer or GST Identification Number by one other investigating workplace or tax administration. File
| Photo Credit: The Hindu
The Department of Revenue has requested the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) officers to hunt a prior written nod of zonal Chief Commissioners earlier than initiating any investigation in instances regarding big industrial homes and major multinational companies (MNCs), in addition to “sensitive matters or matters with national implications”.
The directive is a part of a set of directions issued on March 30, titled ‘Guidelines for CGST field formations in maintaining ease of doing business while engaging in investigation with regular taxpayers’, which state that every investigation have to be initiated solely after the approval of the Principal Commissioner.
The pointers additional specify conditions the place the “prior written approval of the zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner shall be required if investigation is to be initiated and action to be taken in a case falling under” 4 classes.
Apart from massive corporates and major MNCs, a written nod can be mandated for issues which can be already earlier than the GST Council and “of interpretation seeking to levy tax or duty” on any sector, commodity, or service for the primary time, whether or not in Central excise or GST. Tax consultants weren’t but clear about how a ‘big industrial house’ and major MNC can be outlined underneath these norms.
In all these classes of instances, together with “sensitive matters or matters with national implications”, the CGST subject formation involved must also acquire from stakeholders particulars relating to the prevalent commerce practices and nature of transactions carried out. “The implications/impact of such matter should be studied so as to have adequate justification for initiating investigation and taking action,” mentioned the rules.
Uniform process
The framework was conveyed to officers after the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) mentioned the necessity for the CGST subject formations to observe a uniform process in endeavor enforcement actions, involving “regular taxpayers, which incorporates aspects related to the ease of doing business”.
For all investigations, tax officers have been requested to establish if any inquiry has already been initiated on the identical subject material or with respect to the identical taxpayer or GST Identification Number (GSTIN) by one other investigating workplace or tax administration. “The position must be placed before the authority who is to approve initiation of investigation,” the rules mentioned.
The directive will handle trade issues, mentioned KPMG’s nationwide head for oblique tax Abhishek Jain, whereas stressing that implementation might be key. “If followed, it could contribute towards tax certainty and stability in our country’s business landscape,” he mentioned.
