Multiple Car Windows Smashed, Cash, Jewellery, Laptops Stolen In Busy Gurugram Locality; Victim Slams Police Inaction

0
19
Multiple Car Windows Smashed, Cash, Jewellery, Laptops Stolen In Busy Gurugram Locality; Victim Slams Police Inaction


A surprising theft incident has been reported in Haryana’s Gurugram, the place belongings from a number of parked vehicles have been stolen by smashing the home windows. Purna Shukla, whose Honda metropolis was parked reverse the Vatika Business park in Sector 49, alleged that when all her valuables, together with a laptop computer, money, and jewelry, have been stolen. She stated in her grievance that the theft occured between 7.45 pm and 8pm when she stepped down to gather a meals parcel. “We left our car to pick up a parcel at the food corner, and within 15 minutes, our car window was broken, and all our valuable items, including cash, a bag,” Purna Shukla advised Zee News English. She claimed that round 10 different vehicles have been focused and he or she misplaced money between Rs 8000-10000, a laptop computer together with useful jewelry. She alleged that some 5-6 complainants misplaced a mixed quantity of Rs 6-7 lakhs.

Gurugram Police’s Lacklustre Approach

The complainant advised Zee News English that the police PCR arrived half-hour after her name and accused her of maintaining useful belongings on the again seat of her automotive. ‘Aren’t you conscious that there are numerous thefts right here? Why did you allow your belongings within the automotive?. “Of course, they will be stolen,” she quoted the cops as saying.

She responded that “she hails from Mumbai where it is a common practise to keep belongings inside a car and that the city has CCTV cameras installed in every corner.”

The Police PCR group then instructed the complainants to file a grievance with the Sector 50 police station. “They (cops) also said they can’t drop everything else to start looking for my bag because they had other things to do. “This was shocking and disheartening as a result of I anticipated them to assist and shield us,” she added, accusing the police of inaction.

No CCTV Cameras In The Area: Police To Complainant

Sharma claimed that when she requested the police to examine the CCTV cameras within the space, they stated, “There is a lack of cameras, which is why it is difficult to catch the perpetrators.” “We have other priorities during the elections than finding your stolen items,” she quoted the police as saying additional.

Purna Shukla took to social media to query the absence of CCTV cameras in Gurugram’s high-traffic areas. She questioned whether or not a scarcity of CCTV footage is a adequate purpose for the police to dismiss the investigation.

Belongings Stolen From 10 Other Cars: Victim

Shukla stated {that a} related theft was reported in ten different vehicles parked on the incident web site. “It’s troubling that such a serious crime occurred not only with our car, but with nearly ten other cars parked in the same lane. “Their home windows have been additionally damaged, and their belongings have been stolen,” she claimed.

Victim Slams Gurugram Police’s Inaction

Shukla described the Gurugram police’s strategy as surprising, claiming they have been met with an off-the-cuff strategy by the cops. “Gurgaon Police claimed that such thefts are common in that area and that these thieves are very powerful and cunning,” she said. She known as the police response ‘absurd’, claiming that it implied that “a gang of robbers could be more powerful than the police force” and that the cops have been helpless towards extremely educated thieves.

Earlier on Wednesday, unidentified suspects have been arrested for allegedly stealing laptop computer computer systems, cell phones, cash, credit score and debit playing cards, and different paperwork after breaking into two SUVs and a automotive parked at two completely different areas alongside Golf Course Road (GCR), a Hindustan Times report stated.

We tried contacting the investigating officer of the Gurugram police on a telephone name however couldn’t get a reply.





Source hyperlink