What Is Two-Child Policy In Gujarat Municipal Act? Brought In By CM Modi In 2005-06 That Led To Disqualification Of 2 BJP Councillors | India News

0
14
What Is Two-Child Policy In Gujarat Municipal Act? Brought In By CM Modi In 2005-06 That Led To Disqualification Of 2 BJP Councillors | India News


Two BJP councillors from Amreli in Gujarat’s Damnagar municipality have been disqualified for having a 3rd baby in violation of the Gujarat Municipal Act of 1963. According to the Indian Express, Amreli district collector Ajay Dahiya’s workplace issued an order on Monday disqualifying Kheema Kasotia and Meghna Bokha from serving as councillors of the city native physique, efficient instantly. The collector cited delivery certificates on file with Damnagar municipality’s chief officer, Krupesh Patel, in his determination. However, the disqualification of the councillors could have no impact on the BJP’s management of the civic physique.

What Is 2-Child Policy In Gujarat Municipal Act Of 1963?

In 2005-06, the federal government of then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi amended the Municipal Act of 1963 to ban anybody with greater than two youngsters from contesting elections to native self-government our bodies equivalent to panchayats, municipalities, and municipal firms. The Gujarat authorities amended the Gujarat Local Authorities Act in 2005, successfully amending three acts: the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, the Gujarat Municipalities Act, and the Gujarat Panchayats Act.

What Did The Amreli Collector Say In His Order?

(*2*) the Collector acknowledged in his ruling. Respondents No. 1 (Khima Kasotia) and 2 (Meghna Bokha) had two youngsters once they have been elected to the Damnagar Municipality in 2021. The third baby of respondent No. 1 was born on May 10, 2023, whereas respondent No. 2’s third baby was born on March 14, 2023.This is a violation of Section 11 (1) (h) of the Gujarat Municipal Act, in response to the collector’s order.

What’s The Whole Case Behind BJP Councillors Disqualification?

The collector’s order got here in response to an utility filed by a diamond polisher from Damnagar on January 16. Taking cognizance of Chhagaionn Bhakarsar’s utility, the collector sought data from the chief officer and two corporators. The two corporators opposed the applying, saying the rule doesn’t apply to the delivery of the third baby after the elections to the municipality. However, the Collector turned down their plea.

What Did The Disqualified BJP Councillors Said?

On August 4, 2005, Section 11 (1) (h) was added to the Gujarat Municipal Act, making those that had a 3rd baby after changing into a councillor within the municipality ineligible for membership. According to the report, Kasotia and Bokha grew to become councillors for the primary time. “I will study the Collector’s decision to disqualify me and then decide the future course of action,” Kasotia, 26, acknowledged.’

Bokha’s husband, Arvind, acknowledged that he accepts the collector’s order. “We have been underneath the impression that having a 3rd baby whereas serving as a councillor had no bearing in your place. But if the rule says so and my spouse is disqualified, I’ll settle for it.

“I am not denying the fact that we became parents of a third child last year and if there is any rule that disqualifies someone from becoming a parent of a third child, we don’t want to go against it,” he added.



Source hyperlink