Bibhav Kumar, an in depth aide to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, filed a plea on May 31 difficult his arrest within the assault case alleged by AAP MP Swati Maliwal. The Delhi High Court has agreed to listen to the plea on May 31. On Wednesday, Bibhav Kumar moved Delhi High Court, requesting that his detention by the Delhi Police be dominated illegal and an apparent violation of Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The plea additionally asks for an order compensating the petitioner for his illegal arrest, which was a transparent and blatant breach of the regulation. On May 18, he was taken into custody by the Delhi Police on prices of assaulting Rajyasabha MP Swati Maliwal.
He was arrested by the Delhi Police on May 18, after he was accused of assaulting Rajyasabha MP Swati Maliwal. “Departmental action be initiated against the unknown erring officials, who were involved in the decision making viz. the arrest of the petitioner,” said the plea.Â
Seeks Compensation For His ‘Illegal Arrest’
Recently the trial court docket dismissed Bibhav’s bail petition and said that the investigation is at an preliminary stage and influencing of witnesses and tampering with proof can’t be dominated out. The trial Court additional mentioned, “The investigation is still at the nascent stage and the apprehension of influencing the witnesses or tampering with the evidence cannot be ruled out. Keeping in view the allegations made against the applicant, at this stage, no ground for bail is made out.” The applicant was current on the CM’s home even after his employment had been terminated, it additional famous. The investigating company has additionally reported that the applicant has formatted his cell phone and has not supplied the password for opening his cell phone. The CCTV footage collected from the Hon ‘ble CM’s camp workplace can also be said to be clean, the court docket famous within the order.
The court docket said that the applicant (Bibhav Kumar) was joined within the investigation, however as per the investigation officer, he didn’t cooperate within the investigation and he was arrested to stop him from tampering with the essential proof. During the arguments, the Counsel for the complainant argued that the sufferer is the sitting MP of the Aam Aadmi Party and earlier additionally, she had gone to fulfill the CM and she or he can’t be termed a trespasser, quite it was the applicant/accused who was current within the CM workplace with none authority.
It was additional contended that nobody had reported the matter to the police from the CM workplace and it was the complainant who had made the criticism to the police from the spot itself. It was additionally argued that the magnitude of the accidents was such that they had been current even after 4 days when the medical examination was achieved. He contended that the complainant had had an affiliation with the CM for the final 9 years and she or he was brutally assaulted.Â
