Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed a girl’s petition claiming that Prince Harry of the United Kingdom promised to marry her. The Court rejected the plea calling it “day dreamer’s fantasy”.
The petitioner an advocate sought authorized motion in opposition to Prince Harry and demanded to direct United Kingdom Police Cell to take motion as he didn’t ship on the promise to marry her. She requested that arrest warrants have to be issued in opposition to him in order that there isn’t a additional delay of their marriage.
ALSO READ: Bengaluru Wife Seeks Divorce After Unemployed Husband Turns Escort During Lockdown
The Court inquired whether or not the petitioner has ever travelled to the UK for which she replied that she hasn’t and reiterated that she solely spoke to ‘Prince Harry’ by way of social media.
The single decide Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan mentioned that it’s possible that the petitioner was in dialog with somebody utilizing a faux ID and such conversations could be relied upon by the court docket.
The excessive court docket mentioned: “There is every possibility that so-called Prince Harry may be sitting in a Cyber Cafe of a village in Punjab, looking for greener pastures for himself”.
She additionally claimed that she even despatched messages to Prince Charles that his son Prince Harry is engaged together with her.
After inspecting the printouts of the dialog the Court said that these weren’t true copies as bits from it had been erased apart from the truth that these are possible from a faux ID.
“I find that this petition is nothing, but just a daydreamer’s fantasy about marrying Prince Harry. This petition, though very poorly drafted, both grammatically and lacking the knowledge of pleadings, speaks about some emails between the petitioner and Prince Harry, in which the person, sending the email, has stated that he promise to marry soon,” the order mentioned.
While the Court empathised with the petitioner for falling for a ‘Catfish’, the order additional said: “In view of the above, this Court finds no ground to entertain this petition and can only show its sympathy for the petitioner that she has believed such fake conversation to be true.”.
