Prayagraj: Big replace on the Gyanvapi Mosque case, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee filed an pressing utility within the Allahabad High Court searching for a keep on the April eighth ASI examine stating that permitting an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) examine of the Mosque was handed illegally and with out jurisdiction.
The petition states that the Allahabad High Court has already reserved a choice on the matter.
ALSO READ: Retired Judge, Who Acquitted 32 In Babri Masjid Demolition Case, Appointed As Deputy Lokayukta
In the applying filed by Anjuman Intezamia by senior advocates Farman Ahmad Naqvi and Syed Ahmad Faizan states that the decrease court docket ignored your entire written submissions and applicability of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and Order 7 Rule 11D of the Civil Procedure Code.
A Varanasi court docket on Thursday ordered an archaeological survey of the Kashi Vishwanath temple and the Gyanvapi mosque premises to resolve a lingering dispute involving the 2 shrines. The order was given by a senior division civil court docket on a plea pending earlier than it since 2019, petitioner counsel Vijay Shankar Rastogi stated.
The quick monitor court docket of Varanasi has ordered the ASI to analyze the Kashi Visheshwarnath temple and the Gyanvapi mosque case, the court docket has ordered a five-member committee to conduct an archaeological investigation of the mosque complicated.
Kashi Visheshwarnath temple facet claims that the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb destroyed the temple in 1664 and after destroying the temple, the mosque is constructed on its stays. In order to know the fact, a requirement has been made to conduct a survey of your entire campus within the court docket.
Reacting to the Varanasi court docket order, UP Sunni Central Waqf Board in Lucknow stated it can problem the subordinate court docket’s order within the Allahabad High Court.
