The four earthquakes in October close to Herat, Afghanistan, needs to be referred to as as ‘multiplets’ moderately than mainshocks or aftershocks
| Photo Credit: AP
In a brief span of a couple of week, a area about 40 km from Herat, Afghanistan was struck by four shallow focus earthquakes of 6.3 magnitude. The first earthquake of 6.3 magnitude occurred at a depth of 14 km at round 11 am native time on October 7. This was adopted by one other earthquake of 6.3 magnitude (at 13.5 km depth) about half-hour after the primary quake. Two extra shallow focus earthquakes of 6.3 magnitude at 9 km and 6.3 km depths struck the area near Herat on October 11 and October 15, respectively. All four earthquakes occurred on east-west hanging fault planes that dip to both the north or south. The earthquakes occurred throughout the Eurasia plate in an intracontinental mountain belt.
Aftershocks, by default, have magnitudes lower than the principle occasion. However, all of the four earthquakes close to Herat have the same magnitude. “Because these two earthquakes [on October 7] and the two subsequent earthquakes [on October 11 and October 15] are all approximately the same magnitude, we would call them ‘multiplets’ rather than mainshocks, foreshocks, or aftershocks,” geophysicist Dr. William Bill Barnhart, Assistant Coordinator on the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program instructed The Hindu by e mail.
On whether or not the earthquakes had occurred within the same fault, Dr. Barnhart stated: “Preliminary, though uncompleted analysis, indicates that all four M6.3 [magnitude] earthquakes occurred along the same fault or fault system. They did not occur in the exact same spot; rather, they ruptured different portions of the same fault along its length. It is rare for an earthquake to rupture the entire length of the fault that the earthquake occurred on, so it often requires multiple earthquakes, spread out over some unknown amount of time, to fully rupture a geologic fault.”
Explaining how the second earthquake on October 7 with 6.3 magnitude had occurred simply half-hour after the primary one, Dr. R.Okay. Chadha, former scientists at NGRI and at present a Raja Ramanna Fellow at NGRI had instructed The Hindu that “the release of stress in one fault [in Herat] can result in the loading of stress at another fault. The loading of stress can result in another earthquake which can be of similar magnitude or even higher magnitude.”
Dr. Barnhart elaborating on this additional stated: “Understanding the relationships between these earthquakes will take further research. However, given the close spatial and temporal proximity of all of these earthquakes, it’s reasonable to infer that the stress changes from one earthquake potentially encouraged the subsequent earthquakes. These stressing relationships — where stress changes from one earthquake encourage a subsequent earthquake — are quite common in nature.”
Since all of the four earthquakes occurred as a consequence of thrust faulting, the place one block strikes up relative to the opposite, the world the place the earthquakes had occurred would expertise upliftment. “Observations of surface motion from satellites indicate that there has been at least 55 cm of uplift caused by these earthquakes,” Dr. Barnhart stated. “Each earthquake causes both uplift and subsidence, with the primary deformation being uplift. The earthquake sequence has led to an accumulation of uplift along the fault that is rupturing. The USGS does not yet have observations of the most recent [October 15] M6.3 earthquake to assess the cumulative uplift from all earthquakes so far. The earthquakes are far enough away from Herat that uplift and/or subsidence within Herat is likely negligible.”
On what explains the clustering of four 6.3 magnitude shallow focus earthquakes in a span of a couple of week, he stated that there “isn’t yet a consensus scientific answer to this question”.
