AIMPLB to move SC against Allahabad HC ruling, says ‘Islam doesn’t allow demolition of temples’ – India TV

0
11
AIMPLB to move SC against Allahabad HC ruling, says ‘Islam doesn’t allow demolition of temples’ – India TV


Image Source : PTI Arshad Madani

As the Allahabad High Court refused to give any reduction to the Muslim facet within the Gyanvapi Mosque case, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Friday (February 2) expressed “shock” over the courtroom’s ruling and alleged that the Muslim facet was not given an opportunity to current its facet on the matter. The AIMPLB mentioned that they’d move the Supreme Court against the order of the courtroom and in addition search appointment from President Droupadi Murmu.

This comes after Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, which manages Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi did not get any reduction from the Allahabad High Court on Friday because it filed a plea difficult a Varanasi courtroom’s order permitting Hindus to carry out prayers within the southern cellar of the mosque.

AIMPLB addresses press convention

Addressing a press convention, AIMPLB chief Saifullah Rahmani mentioned that the High Court’s choice has given a “big shock” to the Muslims in addition to the secular individuals of the nation.

“Gyanvapi case has given a big shock to 20 crore Muslims as well as secular people. Today, secular Hindus and Sikhs are all sad and shocked. It is said that Muslims demolished the temples and built mosques over them, which is absolutely false. Islam does not allow this,” he mentioned.

“If Muslims had thought that we should build temples on other people’s land, then would the temples have remained for so many years when Muslims were in power?” he requested.

Terming the High Court’s ruling as “disappointing”, Rahmani alleged that there’s a “separate law for majority” within the courts. He additionally cited the Supreme Court’s verdict on the Ram Mandir challenge in 2019 and mentioned that the Babri Masjid was not constructed by demolishing the temple.

“The decisions of the courts are disappointing. In the Gyanvapi case, the other party was not given a chance to present its views in the court. There is a separate law for the majority in the courts. Same decision was taken in Ram temple also. The temple was never demolished there to build the mosque. Our courts are also following the path of breaking people’s trust. We regret that when people of all religions together gave martyrdom, now everyone is not being seen equal,” the AIMPLB chief alleged.

“We will move Supreme Court against the decision of the Allahabad High Court. We will ask for an appointment with the President,” he introduced.

Arshad Madani alleges courtroom’s ruling primarily based on religion

Maulana Arshad Madani, additionally current on the press convention, mentioned that the decision on Babri Masjid opened the way in which for such choices.

“The Babri Masjid decision opened the way for these people.. The decision was taken not according to the law but on the basis of faith. The court is seeing what the majority society wants. The same decision is taken,” Madani alleged.

Mahmood Madani alleged that there’s a huge query mark on India’s judicial system.

“There is a big question mark on India’s judicial system. There is a big question mark on India’s judicial system. The higher courts are not ready to hear it due to technical reasons. Where should we go?” he mentioned.

“The matter should not escalate to such an extent that things get worse.. It is everyone’s responsibility to take the country forward. We are being treated like enemies,” he alleged.

Gyanvapi case

Earlier, a Varanasi Court requested the District Magistrate (DM) to make preparations for ‘Puja/Raga-Bhoga’ of Idols inside Mosque’s Southern Cellar (Vyas Ji Tahkhana).

The Muslim facet filed a plea in district courtroom looking for a keep for 15 days on puja contained in the basement. The Hindu facet additionally filed a caveat, looking for that it must be heard earlier than the courtroom passes any order.

The matter was talked about earlier than Acting Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta by senior advocate SFA. Naqvi and he was requested to move an pressing itemizing plea earlier than the Registrar Listing.

The improvement comes after the Supreme Court refused to urgently hear the Mosque Committee’s plea against the order permitting puja in Vyas Ji ka Tehkhana, positioned on the southern cellar of the Mosque.

The Varanasi District Judge had directed the district administration to make acceptable preparations inside 7 days for Hindus to conduct worship rituals inside one of the sealed cellars (Vyas ji ka tehkhana) inside the present Gyanvapi mosque advanced.

ALSO READ | Puja to proceed inside Gyanvapi advanced as Allahabad HC refuses to give reduction to Muslim facet





Source hyperlink