New Delhi: The Rouse Avenue court docket in Delhi has issued a summons to Arvind Kejriwal for February 17. We inform you why this summons has been issued. Actually, the court docket has issued a summons to Arvind Kejriwal in a felony case below Section 174 of the IPC. The court docket stated in its order that it agrees with the grievance and info offered by the investigation company that there’s a prima facie case in opposition to Arvind Kejriwal below Section 174 of the IPC.
What is Section 174 of the IPC?
Actually, it’s a punishable offence to not seem earlier than a public servant (public servant) in defiance of his order. IPC 174 says that whoever intentionally fails to adjust to a legitimate summons issued by a public servant, he will be held responsible below this part. Under this, there could be a punishment of as much as one month or a positive of 5 hundred rupees or each.
What did the court docket discover?
The court docket stated in its order that ED’s investigation officer, assistant director Jogendra, issued a discover on this case on October 30, 2023, wherein Arvind Kejriwal was known as on November 2. On December 18, 2023, one other discover was issued, wherein he was known as on December 21, 2023. On December 22, 2023, one other discover was issued, wherein he was known as on January 3.
In which he was known as for questioning within the investigation occurring below the PMLA legislation. According to the legislation, the officer of the assistant director rank is a reliable officer to difficulty a discover. It has additionally been proved that Arvind Kejriwal had acquired these summons, as a result of he had additionally despatched his reply. Section 50 (3) of the PMLA legislation says that if anybody is issued a summons, he’s legally obliged to adjust to it. Why did the court docket difficulty summons
The court docket stated in its order that on the stage of taking cognizance, the court docket solely must be happy that whether or not there may be proof of the alleged crime and whether or not there may be adequate foundation for proving the accused. Since on this case there may be proof of issuing summons and never complying with them, there may be adequate foundation below Section 174 of the IPC.
