Ameesha Patel was final seen in Gadar 2.
A movie producer from Ranchi filed a case in opposition to Ameesha Patel, accusing her of extortion.
Actress Ameesha Patel was scheduled to seem within the Civil Court of Ranchi on Tuesday, March 5, concerning a dishonest and cheque bounce case; however she was absent. Her lawyer requested for a postponement, citing private causes. In response, the complainant’s lawyer objected, stating that the case has been delayed a number of instances on account of such requests for extensions. Giving her one closing alternative, Judicial Magistrate DN Shukla ordered her to seem in courtroom on the subsequent scheduled date and supply her assertion beneath Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). This matter dates again to 2018, as reported by IANS.
Film producer Ajay Kumar Singh from Ranchi filed a case in opposition to Ameesha Patel, accusing her of extortion beneath the pretext of music manufacturing. He alleged that Ameesha Patel had acquired Rs 2.5 crore from him concerning manufacturing of a movie referred to as Desi Magic.
According to the contract between them, when the movie was not launched as agreed in June 2018, Ajay demanded compensation from Ameesha. Despite a number of reminders, the actress procrastinated, finally issuing two cheques totaling Rs 2.5 crore and Rs 50 lakh in October 2018, each of which bounced. Despite a number of summons, Ameesha Patel didn’t seem in courtroom, both in individual or by means of her lawyer. Subsequently, a warrant was issued for her arrest, main her to give up within the civil courtroom on June 19 of final yr. Following the listening to, the courtroom granted her bail on two bonds of Rs 10,000 every.
In 2004, Ameesha Patel and her father caught up in a string of economic and authorized conflicts, which reworked their non-public disagreements right into a extremely publicised feud. These disputes have been largely fueled by issues associated to monetary mismanagement, insufficient communication, and conflicting enterprise ventures. Ameesha alleged that her father mishandled her funds, misrepresented her skilled obligations, and unlawfully utilised her property with out authorisation.
