Last Updated: December 14, 2023, 14:36 IST
Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Row: According to an advocate, there exists a lotus-shaped pillar which is attribute of Hindu temples and a picture of ‘Sheshnaag’. (File photograph)
Shahi Idgah Row: The petition was filed by the deity (Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman) and 7 others by way of advocates, claiming that Lord Sri Krishna’s birthplace lies beneath the mosque
The Allahabad excessive courtroom on Thursday allowed a plea to nominate a court-monitored advocate commissioner to conduct a survey of the disputed Shahi Idgah premises adjoining the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura.
The bench, headed by Justice Mayank Kumar, stated that the courtroom will on December 18 determined who would be the courtroom commissioner.
On November 16, Justice Mayank Kumar Jain had reserved the order on the appliance after listening to the events involved.
The utility was filed within the pending swimsuit earlier than the excessive courtroom regarding Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque dispute.
The petition was filed by the deity (Bhagwan Sri Krishna Virajman) and 7 others by way of advocates Hari Shankar Jain, Vishnu Shankar Jain, Prabhash Pandey and Devki Nandan, claiming that Lord Sri Krishna’s birthplace lies beneath the mosque and that there are various indicators which set up that the mosque was a Hindu temple.
According to advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, within the utility, it was submitted that there exists a lotus-shaped pillar which is attribute of Hindu temples and a picture of ‘Sheshnaag’, one of the Hindu deities who protected Lord Krishna on the night time of his start, can also be current there.
It was additionally submitted that on the base of the pillar of the mosque, Hindu non secular symbols and engravings had been additionally seen.
The applicant has requested that a fee could also be appointed with particular instructions to submit its report after conducting a survey inside some stipulated time interval.
An additional route was searched for pictures and videography of the whole proceedings. According to the plaintiffs’ counsel, the factual points of the disputed construction need to be introduced earlier than the courtroom for correct adjudication of the dispute as with out the factual place of the disputed areas, the efficient adjudication of the case is just not doable.
The excessive courtroom in May this 12 months transferred to itself all of the fits pending earlier than the Mathura courtroom praying for numerous reliefs pertaining to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque dispute.
(with inputs from PTI)
