New Delhi: The nationwide capital up to now few weeks has registered regular enchancment in its Coronavirus state of affairs with respect to contemporary instances and positivity charge which can lead folks to wonder if lockdown put in place ought to be prolonged.
Within 5 weeks of lockdown, Delhi has seen Covid-19 each day instances steadily come down from a excessive of 26,000 to three,000-6,000 this week, and the check positivity charge has additionally declined from a excessive of 36 p.c to 5-7 p.c throughout this era. However, the variety of Covid fatalities continues to nonetheless be excessive, falling within the 200-300 vary every day.
ALSO READ | Congress Spokesperson Pawan Khera’s Sister Passes Away, Party Leaders Extend Condolences For The Loss
The lockdown that started on April 18, has been prolonged by the Delhi authorities 4 instances for a length of 1 week every time. The present 1-week restrictions finish on May 24.
Now that there’s additionally a rise within the availability of ICU beds and ventilators in each personal and public hospitals with the restoration charge rising, ought to the lockdown be prolonged?
To perceive what the folks of Delhi need, LocalCircles performed one other survey that obtained near 9,000 responses from residents throughout all 11 districts of Delhi.
68 Percent Of Residents In Favour Of Extending Lockdown/Curfew By At Least 1 Week
In view of the three,000 – 6,000 each day caseload and 5-7 p.c check positivity charge in Delhi, the survey sought responses from residents of Delhi over the extension of lockdown/curfew after May 24.
In response 10 p.c mentioned “extend it by 3 weeks”, 26 p.c mentioned “extend it by 2 weeks”, and 32 p.c mentioned, “extend it by 1 week”. There had been solely 10 p.c voting for “end the lockdown/curfew and remove all restrictions”, whereas 22 p.c mentioned, “end the lockdown/curfew and just impose night and weekend curfew.”
The findings of the ballot point out that 68 p.c of Delhi residents are in favour of extending the lockdown/curfew by a minimum of 1 week. This query within the survey obtained 8,878 responses.
Though the proportion of residents in favour of lockdown extension has dropped, 68 p.c nonetheless assist a 1-week extension:
LocalCircles survey performed on March 28 had indicated that solely 16 p.c of Delhi residents had been in favour of imposing the lockdown within the metropolis.
With an unprecedented rise in instances, shortages of oxygen, and other people seeing their contacts in social networks struggling to seek out hospital and ICU beds, Covid administration medicine, and so forth. and shedding their lives in lots of instances have now largely understood the criticality of the state of affairs.
As a outcome, 59 p.c on April 15 and 68 p.c of residents surveyed on April 23 had been in favour of a lockdown/curfew for a minimum of 1 week. The share of residents of Delhi voting in favour of lockdown on April 29 was 75 p.c, which elevated to 85 p.c on May 7 and fell to 74 p.c on May 13.
Given the enhancing Covid state of affairs, the proportion of residents of Delhi supporting lockdown has additional decreased to 68 p.c this week. Even although there was a decline in share of residents in favour of extending the lockdown, majority of Delhi residents are nonetheless in favour of extending the lockdown which ends on May 24. Key causes behind this are instances of Mucormycosis or Black Fungus being on the rise, ventilator beds in prime hospitals nonetheless troublesome to safe and unfold of prevalent B.1.617.2 variant which is reported to be extremely transmissible.
Two weeks in the past, residents through LocalCircles had demanded that the Government think about re-opening of small companies in residence supply mode in order that enterprise disruption and client inconvenience be minimized.
In the dialogue final week, each residents of Delhi and small companies have reiterated this demand. It is essential that the Delhi Government considers the identical as the complete reopening of actions will stay to be excessive threat. Similarly, folks opined that each one non-essential public locations should proceed to stay closed for the foreseeable future.
