Washington: In a major growth in the protracted legal battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, a Los Angeles Superior Court has ordered Jolie to show over all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) she has signed over the previous eight years.
This choice is the newest twist in their ongoing dispute over the possession of their USD 500 million French vineyard, Chateau Miraval, as confirmed by Page Six.
The court docket ruling mandates that the ‘Maleficent’ star should produce inside the subsequent month all non-privileged paperwork in her possession, custody, or management that reply to Pitt’s legal group’s requests.
A supply near Pitt described the ruling as a “crushing blow” to Jolie, who had beforehand argued that producing the NDAs could be “expensive,” “wasteful,” and “unreasonable,” in addition to an “invasion of privacy” for third events concerned.
As per Page Six, the paperwork in query doubtless embody NDAs associated to Hollywood employers, manufacturers, and private workers, doubtlessly containing delicate details about Jolie’s compensation and contracts with third events.
The court docket’s order additionally requires Jolie to supply an inventory of any paperwork she considers privileged, enabling Pitt’s group to judge her claims of privilege.
The Oscar-winning couple has been embroiled in a legal dispute that has prolonged past their divorce, significantly specializing in the Chateau Miraval vineyard.
Jolie’s legal group has accused Pitt of trying to regulate her via an overreaching NDA, which she claimed was supposed to cowl Pitt’s private misconduct unrelated to the vineyard.
This dispute reportedly hindered an settlement for Jolie to promote her stake in the vineyard to Pitt, main her to promote her shares to a subsidiary of the Stoli Group as an alternative.
Pitt has contested the sale to Stoli, alleging that Jolie acted unfairly in finalizing the deal with out his consent.
According to Page Six, a supply aligned with Pitt famous that this ruling represents one other pre-trial victory for him.
However, Jolie’s lawyer, Paul Murphy, framed the choice in a different way, stating, “Common NDAs are simply not comparable to Mr. Pitt’s last-second demand to try and cover up his personal misconduct.”
He emphasised that the court docket’s acknowledgment of the NDAs’ potential relevance to the case is important, hinting on the broader implications for Pitt’s conduct.
Murphy added, “We welcome that transparency in all parties’ discovery responses, including Mr. Pitt’s. Angelina looks forward to the eventual end of this litigation with its false narratives that continue to hurt the family and interfere with their ability to heal.”
According to Page Six, a supply near Jolie assured that the NDAs are unlikely to be uncovered through the trial.Â
Â
