‘Can’t challenge Centre’s decision’ to ‘J-K is India’s integral part’: 10 highlights of SC verdict

0
19
‘Can’t challenge Centre’s decision’ to ‘J-K is India’s integral part’: 10 highlights of SC verdict


Image Source : PTI Supreme Court verdict on abrogation of Article 370

Four years after the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s particular standing, the Supreme Court declared on Monday that the Center’s choice to abrogate Article 370 was constitutionally legitimate. The apex court docket emphasised that Article 370 was initially a brief provision due to war-like circumstances within the state.

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud acknowledged, (*10*)

After a 16-day listening to, the highest court docket, led by a five-judge Constitution bench consisting of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B R Gavai, and Surya Kant, reserved its verdict on September 5. The bench addressed a batch of pleas difficult the abrogation.

The Supreme Court delivered a big verdict on the abrogation of Article 370, and listed here are some of the notable quotes from the judgment:

  • Every choice taken by Union on behalf of State throughout Presidential rule not open to challenge…this may lead to the administration of state to a standstill.
  • Argument of petitioners that Union can not take actions of irreversible penalties within the State throughout Presidential rule is NOT ACCEPTED.
  • President’s order to scrap Jammu and Kashmir’s particular standing constitutionally legitimate: Supreme Court in majority judgment.
  • Article 370: Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir was by no means meant to be a everlasting physique, says CJI.
  • When the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir ceased to exist, a particular situation for which Article 370 was launched ceased to exist: CJI.
  • CJI: Holding that the ability underneath Article 370(3) ceases to exist after the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly will lead to the freezing of the method of integration.
  • Article 370: CJI says the advice of the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir was not binding on the President of India.
  • Supreme Court asks Centre to maintain elections in Jammu and Kashmir by September 30, 2024.’
  • Requirement of J&Okay constituent Assembly’s advice in Art 370 cannot be learn in method making bigger intention redundant: Justice Kaul
  • Justice SK Kaul in concurring judgment with CJI says objective of Article 370 was to slowly carry J&Okay at par with different Indian states
  • “We direct that steps shall be taken by the Election Commission of India to conduct elections to the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir constituted under Section 14 of the Reorganisation Act by 30 September 2024; restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible,” mentioned CJI DY Chandrachud as Supreme Court delivers verdict on pleas difficult abrogation of Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir.

SC directs ECI to conduct polls

The Supreme Court emphasised on Monday the significance of promptly restoring the statehood of Jammu and Kashmir, urging that elections to the J&Okay Legislative Assembly must be carried out at once. The apex court docket additional directed the Election Commission of India to provoke crucial measures to conduct the polls by September 30, 2024. Chief Justice Chandrachud added, “We direct that steps shall be taken so that elections are held in Legislative Assembly of J&K by September 30, 2024.”

Also learn | Article 370: Supreme Court says President’s order to scrap Jammu and Kashmir’s particular standing legitimate

Latest India News





Source hyperlink