CRS Probe In Odisha Train Accident Finds Major Lapses, Says ‘Incident Could’ve Been Avoided if…’ : 10 Points

0
22
CRS Probe In Odisha Train Accident Finds Major Lapses, Says ‘Incident Could’ve Been Avoided if…’ : 10 Points


New Delhi: A high-level inquiry has recognized “wrong signalling” as the primary trigger for the Balasore practice accident and highlighted “lapses at multiple levels” within the signalling and telecommunication (S&T) division, however implied the tragedy may have been averted if previous pink flags have been reported. The unbiased inquiry report submitted by the Commission of Railway Safety (CRS) to the Railway Board mentioned regardless of the lapses in signalling work, corrective actions may have been taken by the S&T employees if “repeated unusual behaviour” of switches connecting two parallel tracks have been reported to them by the station grasp of Bahanaga Bazar, the positioning of the accident.

10 factors on the Odisha practice accident’s CRS report:

Inquiry report blames “wrong signalling” for Balasore practice accident and cites “lapses at multiple levels” in Signal & Telecommunication division.

cre Trending Stories

Report says accident may have been prevented if S&T employees have been knowledgeable of “repeated unusual behaviour” of switches connecting parallel tracks by station supervisor.

Also Read: Flashback: Like Odisha, Huge Sabotage Claims Were Made On 2016 Kanpur Train Accident- What Came Out?

Report says non-supply of permitted circuit diagram for changing electrical lifting barrier at degree crossing gate 94 led to “wrong wiring” by discipline supervisors.

Report says related incident occurred on May 16, 2022 at Bankranayabaz station resulting from fallacious wiring and cable fault and corrective measures weren’t taken.

The triple practice accident on June 2 killed 292 folks and injured over 1000.

Report says preliminary response to catastrophe must be quicker and advises Railways to overview disaster-response system and coordination with NDRF and SDRF.

Report concludes that rear-collision was resulting from “lapses in the signalling-circuit-alteration” finished at north sign ‘goomty’ previously and through signalling work associated to degree crossing gate 94.

Report says these lapses induced fallacious signalling to coach no. 12841 which collided with items practice standing on UP loop line.

Report recommends updating completion signalling wiring diagrams, different paperwork and lettering of signalling circuits at website.

Report suggests following normal practices for signalling-modification work, finishing up alteration with permitted circuit diagram and officer’s presence, and deploying separate group for checking and testing modified signalling circuits and features.





Source hyperlink