Delhi Court Extends Murder Accused Sushil Kumar’s Police Remand For 4 Days

0
57


New Delhi: Delhi Court on Saturday prolonged wrestler Sushil Kumar’s police remand for 4 days in reference to the homicide of 23-year-old Sagar Rana. 

The Delhi Police had moved an software looking for 7 days police custody remand of two-time Olympic medallist Sushil Kumar and his affiliate Ajay Kumar arrested in reference to the Chhatrasal Stadium homicide case of former junior nationwide wrestling champion Sagar Dhankhar.

ALSO READ | ‘Wanted To Teach Sagar A Lesson’, Sushil Kumar Confesses During Interrogation, Reveals He Was Threatened By Dubai-Based Gangster

After listening to Delhi Police’s plea, Duty Metropolitan Magistrate Mayank Goel pronounced the order saying, “In the interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to allow the application of the police for four days only.” 

Kumar was nabbed final week and remanded in police custody for six days. On Saturday, Sushil Kumar was produced earlier than the court docket on the finish of the remand interval.

Sagar Dhankhar who had been coaching on the iconic Chhatrasal Stadium, died whereas two of his pals obtained injured after they had been allegedly assaulted by Sushil Kumar on May 4, on the Chhatrasal Stadium premises in Delhi. 

Kumar’s 4 associates who had been concerned within the alleged property dispute case that led to the dying of the 23-year-old wrestler. They are energetic members of the Kala Asauda and Neeraj Bawana gangs and had been arrested from Delhi’s Kanjhawala space on Tuesday night time.

ALSO READ | (*4*)’Very Calculative With Answers’: Murder Accused Sushil Kumar Refuses To Cooperate With Investigators; Spends B-day In Lockup

The Delhi Police has lodged an FIR within the case below sections 302 (homicide), 308 (culpable murder), 365 (kidnapping), 325 (inflicting grievous damage), 323 (voluntarily inflicting damage), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 506 (felony intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The FIR was additionally registered below sections 188 (disobedience to order by public servant), 269 (negligent act prone to unfold an infection of illness), 120B (felony conspiracy), and 34 (widespread intention) of the IPC and numerous sections of the Arms Act.



Source hyperlink