Delhi Waqf Board Case: AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, Ten Others Granted Bail | India News

0
18
Delhi Waqf Board Case: AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, Ten Others Granted Bail | India News


New Delhi: The Special CBI Court on Wednesday granted common bail to Aam Aadmi Party`s MLA Amanatullah Khan and ten others in a case of alleged misuse of place associated to “illegal appointments” to the Delhi Waqf board. Earlier they had been granted interim bail by the identical court docket until the disposal of their common bail. According to the CBI FIR, the case registered in 2016 below Section 120B IPC learn with part 13(2) learn with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption act, 1988 (P.C. Act) in opposition to Amantullah Khan and others on allegations that he being chairman of the Delhi Wakf Board (DWB), had acted in a corrupt and unlawful means in getting appointed Mahboob Alam as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the DWB. CBI acknowledged that Amanatullah Khan additionally acquired appointed his family members and different identified individuals on numerous contractual or day by day wage posts in DWB, in collusion with and in furtherance of a felony conspiracy hatched between all of them and all these appointments had been made by misuse and abuse of the official positions of Amanatullah Khan and Mahboob Alam and likewise with out following the due strategy of legislation.

The remainder of the 9 accused within the case are a few of these appointees and likewise the beneficiaries of and members within the above felony conspiracy, as alleged, famous the Court. It was alleged by the CBI that in whole, 41 individuals had been appointed in DWB in numerous capacities and below completely different schemes and these embrace Mahboob Alam who had been appointed as CEOof the DWB.

Also Read: ‘Cut, Commission, Corruption’: BJP’s ‘3C’ Attack On AAP

It was additionally alleged {that a} lack of Rs. 27,20,494/ has been brought on to the federal government exchequer within the type of salaries or different emoluments, which had been paid to the above workers or accused. 

According to the CBI, the chargesheet acknowledged that Amanatullah Khan was elected as a member and likewise the Chairman of DWB in his capability as a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) from Okhla Constituency, New Delhi on the ticket of Aam Adami Party (AAP) and was holding a public workplace on the time of the fee of alleged offences, sanction below Section 19 of the PC Act in addition to 197 Cr.P.C. for his prosecution, on this case, was additionally obtained by CBI and positioned on document as part of the relied upon paperwork filed with the cost sheet. 

Similarly, since Mahboob Alam additionally holding a public workplace, a sanction for his prosecution was additionally obtained and filed on document. However, it’s crucial to say right here that not one of the accused being prosecuted by way of the above cost sheet was arrested by the CBI in the course of the investigation of the case, famous the court docket. 

The Special Judge MK Nagpal on Wednesday whereas handed the order mentioned that contemplating the totality of information and circumstances and in mild of the authorized place mentioned, this court docket is of the thought of opinion that it’s a match case the place bail needs to be granted to the candidates pending trial and there’s no cause or floor for taking any of them into custody. 

Hence, all of them are hereby admitted to bail and are directed to furnish a private bond of Rs. fifty thousand every with one surety of the like quantity every for his or her look earlier than this court docket in the course of the trial and until the disposal of the case, mentioned the Court. None of the candidates within the prima facie view of the court docket can be thought of to be a flight threat as all of them are everlasting residents of their given addresses having roots in society and households to assist. 

Again, it can’t even be ignored that Amanatullah Khan was MLA from the Okhla constituency on the related time of the fee of alleged offences and even now he’s acknowledged to be an MLA from the identical constituency having been elected on the ticket of AAP, mentioned the Court.





Source hyperlink