In in the present day’s DNA, Sourabh Raaj Jain analysed the claims made by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Parliament the place he termed former Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru’s two selections associated to Kashmir as blunders. In the Lok Sabha in the present day, the talk on the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Bill was taken up for the second day in the present day. This invoice proposed reserving two seats for Kashmiri migrants within the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly and one seat for displaced people from Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Amidst this dialogue, when Home Minister Amit Shah started talking, the discourse initially revolved round Article 370 and step by step shifted focus to Pandit Nehru.
According to Amit Shah, Pandit Nehru is immediately chargeable for the Kashmir challenge, highlighting two blunders made by him. Amit Shah asserted that Pandit Nehru’s first blunder was declaring a ceasefire when the Indian Army was profitable within the 1947-48 warfare in Kashmir. The second blunder, as per Amit Shah, was Pandit Nehru taking the Kashmir challenge to the United Nations.
नेहरु की ‘गलतियों’ का नतीजा है PoK !
गोगामेड़ी हत्याकांड का ‘इंवेस्टिगेटिव’ DNA टेस्ट
उत्तर भारतीयों से इतना चिढ़ती क्यों है DMK ?देखिए #DNA LIVE @saurabhraajjain के साथ#DNAWithSourabh #SukhdevSinghGogaMedi #JawaharlalNehru #ZeeNews #ZeeStay https://t.co/glVaYs0K7o
— Zee News (@ZeeNews) December 6, 2023
When questioned in regards to the choice to declare a ceasefire, Pandit Nehru had mentioned, “We opted for a ceasefire to maintain peace and stop bloodshed. However, this was interpreted that whoever’s army is present in a region, has the right to that territory. Pakistan thinks it has rights over PoK and also believes it has the right to intervene in the remaining parts of Kashmir.”
This signifies that Pandit Nehru himself knew that he had made a big mistake concerning the Kashmir challenge, which Pakistan has been benefitting from up to now. Home Minister Amit Shah reiterated this level within the Lok Sabha in the present day. However, the Congress occasion stays unwilling to acknowledge it. Nevertheless, the reality stays unaffected by whether or not one accepts it or not.