In at present’s DNA, Ram Mohan Sharma analysed the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi row. The ASI survey report within the knowledge-intensive space has been made public. You should be conscious that it’s being concluded that originally, earlier than the development of the Gyanvapi Masjid, there was an historical Hindu temple at that website. However, this isn’t true. Because the ASI survey report, documented in 839 pages, clearly states that the Gyanvapi Masjid was not constructed by demolishing a Hindu temple. Instead, the construction of the temple was modified, and it was transformed right into a mosque. Even at present, what is known as a mosque is, in actuality, a Hindu temple, not a mosque. In easy phrases, the temple was not destroyed however remodeled right into a mosque by altering its construction and concealing it. We will show this primarily based on the ASI survey report.
Zee News presently possess the ASI survey report, and at present it would present you each piece of proof offered on this report, proving that the Babri Masjid was initially a Hindu temple.
नीतीश की ‘पलटीमार’ राजनीति का DNA टेस्ट
ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद के ASI सर्वे का ‘तार्किक विश्लेषण’
गणतंत्र दिवस पर दिखा भारत का दमदेखिए DNA LIVE @ramm_sharma के साथ
#DNA #GyanvapiCase #ASIReport #NitishKumar #BiharPolitics #RepublicDay2024 #ZeeDwell https://t.co/ebYjxjLHb9
— Zee News (@ZeeNews) January 26, 2024
A noteworthy level is that every one the fragmented sculptures of Hindu deities have been discovered within the Western Chamber of the mosque. They have been found buried underneath the bottom in trench S-2. This means that throughout the conversion of the Hindu temple right into a mosque, the sculptures of Hindu deities have been probably uprooted or broken after which hidden within the Western Chamber. There are two main causes behind this. Firstly, idol worship is prohibited in Islam. Secondly, there was an try to erase proof of the mosque being initially a Hindu temple, and this try was profitable for almost three centuries. However, the ASI survey has now revealed the reality.
During the survey, a damaged inscription was discovered. The picture of this inscription was additionally recorded by the ASI in 1965-66. You are presently seeing each photos in your TV display screen. The inscription in Persian on the damaged slab can be defined within the ASI report. It mentions that Hazrat Alamgir, which means the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, constructed the mosque within the 1676-77 interval. The inscription additionally states that the mosque underwent repairs within the yr 1792-93.
Now, it’s important to notice that there’s a distinction between the current and the 1965 photos. Both photos have six traces written in Persian on the slab. In the previous picture, all traces are clear, whereas within the current picture, an try has been made to erase two traces. The ASI report additionally mentions that the final two traces on this inscription have been deliberately erased, and this erasure occurred after 1965.
