The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) has contended that implementation of Calling Name Presentation (CNAP) shouldn’t be made necessary however saved optionally available for telecom operators. It cited technical, privateness and cost-related issues with regulator TRAI to argue its level.
The submissions got here as half of a session course of initiated by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on the necessity to introduce the Calling Name Presentation (CNAP) supplementary service within the telecommunication networks.Â
It is price mentioning, CNAP is a supplementary service which permits the caller’s name to flash on cellphone screens when somebody calls. The idea is extra just like the Truecaller software which identifies the caller. COAI, whose members embrace Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, stated “CNAP should not be mandatory and instead be optional for the telecom service providers”.
“Implementation of CNAP should be left to TSPs and they may consider implementing the same keeping the market dynamics/business case in mind,” COAI stated.
What are the issues in implementing caller name show?
In its arguments, COAI identified that not all handsets are succesful of supporting such functionalities. It additionally flagged issues associated to the privateness and confidentiality of the nation’s subscriber data.
Given that handset producers and working system suppliers have management over the info obtained by the CNAP facility, this might end result within the breach of subscriber information privateness because the producers of cell units and OS suppliers would amass subscriber information for the whole nation, COAI cautioned.
“This would be the biggest concern related to privacy and confidentiality of the entire country’s subscriber information, which would be akin to building up of a name and mobile number database as is in the Aadhaar database, with third parties,” COAI stated.
“Will not be cost-effective”
The affiliation needed to know whether or not any research exists on the advantages of such a system. It stated an in depth cost-benefit evaluation ought to be carried out earlier than the adoption of CNAP “if at all its implementation of CNAP is to be considered in India”. TRAI should perform a Regulatory Impact Assessment earlier than popping out with any advice, COAI stated.
The trade body additionally drew consideration to the technical complexities concerned within the implementation of CNAP and went on to say that this can be very vital that the authority shares the draft advice with the trade for feedback and inputs “prior to finalising the same”. While there are advantages which can be derived by the subscribers from such a service, there are additionally a number of challenges in the direction of its implementation in India, the trade stated.
What Jio stated?
In its submission to TRAI’s session paper, Reliance Jio stated Calling Name Presentations shouldn’t be a compulsory service, given the restricted availability of CNAP-enabled units in India. “…CNAP facilities is good to have supplementary VAS service, however, in a country where over 375 million users (over 350 million mobile non-broadband users and over 25 million wireline users) are unlikely to possess a CNAP enabled device, in addition to a sizable portion of the wireless broadband users that may not be possessing CNAP enabled devices as well, it can safely be said that it should not be a mandatory service,” Jio stated.
Jio additionally defined there will be many technical points like an elevated load on signalling and attainable affect on latency and interconnection-related points, and added “therefore, a cautious approach is recommended.” “There are privacy-related concerns with mandatory activation of the CNAP service on every device,” Jio stated.
Given the shopper privateness issues, the ability shouldn’t be mandated and if voluntarily applied by telcos ought to be primarily based on opt-in consent, Jio stated.
The show of a name on the time of calling can lead to varied social and felony points. “Therefore, it is imperative that the consent of the customer is taken before activating CNAP service on his/her device,” Jio stated. Jio stated it’s protected to assume that necessary CNAP activation will not survive authorized scrutiny. “Furthermore, when a large section of telecom subscribers that is users on 2G-3G feature phones, 4G feature phones, smartphones not enabled with CNAP, smartphones requiring major update for CNAP, landline users etc will anyways be not able to avail this service, then the mandatory activation is a moot point and should be avoided,” in accordance to Jio.
Also Read:Â Jio Down: Many customers complained in regards to the network- All you want to know
