Alphabet’s Google is about to go earlier than a federal jury in Boston on Tuesday in a trial over accusations that processors it makes use of to energy synthetic intelligence know-how in key merchandise infringe a pc scientist’s patents.
Singular Computing, based by Massachusetts-based laptop scientist Joseph Bates, claims Google copied his know-how and used it to assist AI options in Google Search, Gmail, Google Translate and different Google companies.
A Google court docket submitting mentioned that Singular has requested as much as $7 billion (roughly Rs. 58,172 crore) in financial damages, which might be greater than double the largest-ever patent infringement award in US historical past.
Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda referred to as Singular’s patents “dubious” and mentioned that Google developed its processors “independently over many years.”
“We look forward to setting the record straight in court,” Castaneda mentioned.
An legal professional for Singular declined to touch upon the case.
The trial is anticipated to final two to 3 weeks.
Singular’s 2019 grievance mentioned Bates shared his computer-processing improvements with Google between 2010 and 2014. Singular mentioned Google’s Tensor Processing Units, which improve the tech large’s AI capabilities, copy Bates’ know-how and infringe two patents.
The lawsuit mentioned that Google’s circuits use an improved structure Bates found that permits for better processing energy and has “revolutionized the way AI training and inference are accomplished.”
Google launched its processing items in 2016 to energy AI used for speech recognition, content material technology, advert suggestion and different features. Singular mentioned that variations 2 and three of the items, launched in 2017 and 2018, violate its patent rights.
Google advised the court docket in December that its processors work in several methods than Singular’s patented know-how and that the patents are invalid.
“Google engineers had mixed feelings about the technology and the company ultimately rejected it, explicitly telling Dr. Bates that his idea was not right for the type of applications Google was developing,” Google mentioned in a court docket submitting.
A US appeals court docket in Washington additionally will hear arguments on Tuesday about whether or not to invalidate Singular’s patents in a separate case that Google appealed from the US Patent and Trademark Office.
© Thomson Reuters 2024
Catch the newest from the Consumer Electronics Show on Gadgets 360, at our CES 2024 hub.
