How shipping more US natural gas to Europe helped fuel CO2 pollution

0
30
How shipping more US natural gas to Europe helped fuel CO2 pollution


Carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas services have jumped to 18 million tons per 12 months, up 81% since 2019, including a quantity of greenhouse gas to the environment equal to that produced by a number of large coal crops, in accordance to United States authorities information.

They might more than double to 45 million tons per 12 months by the top of the last decade as new services, inspired by hovering abroad demand for the super-cooled fuel, come on-line, in accordance to firm projections supplied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission tallied by Reuters.

The emissions figures and projections, which haven’t been beforehand reported, mirror a difficult tradeoff for the Biden administration, which needs to enhance fuel shipments to European allies whereas additionally chopping greenhouse gas output at house to battle local weather change.

The Biden White House has stated U.S. LNG will help Europe scale back its dependence on gas provides from Russia, which is going through western sanctions over its struggle in Ukraine. The administration authorized 5 U.S. LNG export licenses to serve the European market following Russia’s invasion, having authorized none beforehand.

The White House didn’t return messages searching for touch upon the rise in emissions from the LNG sector. The Energy Department, which oversees LNG export allowing, stated it’s funding a number of initiatives targeted on decreasing carbon dioxide emissions from LNG terminals and different sources.

U.S. particular local weather envoy John Kerry instructed Reuters final 12 months that greenhouse gas emissions had been an inevitable “downside” to growing LNG exports to European allies.

Carbon dioxide emissions from all seven working U.S. LNG export services totaled 17.6 million tons in 2022, up 81% since 2019 when the sector had 6 services, in accordance to EPA information.

By 2028, 5 tasks now underneath building are due to come on-line, producing an extra 27 million tons a 12 months of emissions, in accordance to firm projections supplied to the EPA and FERC.

That works out to more than 45 million tons per 12 months by the top of the last decade or roughly 2.5% of present carbon emissions from the U.S. energy business.

LNG exporters, in the meantime, have shelved plans to use carbon seize and sequestration (CCS) to scale back emissions, in accordance to regulatory filings, casting doubt on the viability of the expertise as a large-scale answer to the business’s local weather influence.

CO2 emissions from the energy-intensive technique of liquefying gas for export mark just one stage within the business’s general local weather influence. Methane leaks throughout drilling, piping, shipping, and distribution additionally add to pollution – even earlier than the fuel is used.

A cleaner fuel?

The United States turned an LNG exporter in 2016 on the again of a home natural gas drilling growth, with abroad shipments rising quick.

U.S. LNG exports averaged a report 11.6 billion cubic toes per day throughout the first half of 2023, up 4% from the primary half of final 12 months, with a lot of these volumes going to Europe, making the United States the world’s largest exporter, in accordance to the Energy Information Administration.

Advocates of LNG argue the fuel burns cleaner than coal.

“Countries around the world are looking to replicate the US model for economic development and rapid carbon emissions reductions, which is to move away from dirtier fuels and towards pairing natural gas with renewables,” stated Robert Fee, vp of local weather and worldwide affairs for LNG exporter Cheniere Energy.

Critics argue that it’s unclear whether or not the U.S. gas export growth to Europe is displacing coal or delaying a transition to renewables like photo voltaic and wind.

“We don’t really know how much coal is being displaced in these overseas markets,” stated Alexandra Shaykevich, an analyst at Washington-based Environmental Integrity Project.

Carbon seize doubts

Three LNG operators – Freeport LNG, Sempra and Venture Global in 2021 and 2022 introduced plans to use carbon seize to hold a portion of their greenhouse gases from reaching the environment.

Freeport’s CCS venture was to begin injecting CO2 pollution from its Texas plant into the bottom by 2024, in accordance to a 2021 press launch. But in an August disclosure to the SEC, its accomplice within the venture, Talos Energy, stated, “We have no future development plans related to the project.”

Freeport declined to touch upon the event and Talos didn’t return messages.

Sempra final 12 months introduced a plan to incorporate a CCS venture in its Cameron LNG facility in Louisiana. But the corporate has stated in SEC disclosures that the venture wants a dedication from its companions earlier than transferring forward.

Sempra didn’t reply to requests for touch upon the probability the venture can be constructed.

Upcoming CCS tasks are additionally unsure.

NextDecade Corp has stated its proposed terminal close to Brownsville, Texas, might take away more than 90% of its anticipated 6.4 million tons per 12 months of carbon emissions. But the corporate instructed Reuters the economics are unsure.

“There must be customers that are willing to support the revenue requirements to cover the cost to finance, build and operate the facility and to provide acceptable returns on invested capital,” spokesperson Susan Richardson stated.



Source hyperlink