Madras High Court advances hearing of appeals filed by O. Panneerselvsm, three others, from April 20 to 12

0
22
Madras High Court advances hearing of appeals filed by O. Panneerselvsm, three others, from April 20 to 12


The Madras High Court on Monday agreed to advance the hearing of appeals most well-liked by AIADMK expelled leaders O. Panneerselvam and three others, from April 20 to April 12, because it was represented that the get together had determined to conduct its govt committee assembly on April 16.

The Third Division Bench of Justices R. Mahadevan and Mohammed Shaffiq accepted a request made by senior counsel Guru Krishnakumar, representing the appellants, for an early hearing of the appeals with a rider that the hearing could be confined to the conduct of the chief committee assembly and never on the deserves of the appeals.

Mr. Panneerselvam, P.H. Manoj Pandian, R. Vaithilingam and J.C.D. Prabhakar had filed the appeals in opposition to the refusal of Justice Ok. Kumaresh Babu to grant an interim injunction restraining the get together from implementing sure resolutions handed at its common council assembly held on July 11, 2022 and the ensuing election to the submit of common secretary.

The resolutions handed by the overall council had abolished the posts of coordinator and joint coordinator, which have been held by Mr. Panneerselvam and Edappadi Ok. Palanaiswami respectively and revived the submit of common secretary to which Mr. Palaniswami was declared elected unopposed instantly after the one choose refused to grant an injunction.

A particular decision handed by the overall council had expelled the 4 leaders from the get together for the cost of performing in opposition to its pursuits. Though the one choose, prima facie, discovered infraction of the get together bylaws within the expulsion with out issuing a discover, he refused to cross an order of interim injunction on the bottom that it might be detrimental to the pursuits of the get together.

The Division Bench led by Justice Mahadevan had on April 3 determined to take up the appeals, in opposition to the one choose’s determination, for remaining hearing on April 20 and 21.



Source hyperlink