New information collected by researchers utilizing Japan’s Subaru telescope may reveal insights into why the universe exists. Image for Representation.
| Photo Credit: AP
When theoretical physicists like myself say that we’re learning why the universe exists, we sound like philosophers. But new information collected by researchers utilizing Japan’s Subaru telescope has revealed insights into that very query.
The Big Bang kick-started the universe as we all know it 13.8 billion years in the past. Many theories in particle physics counsel that for all the matter created at the universe’s conception, an equal quantity of antimatter ought to have been created alongside it. Antimatter, like matter, has mass and takes up house. However, antimatter particles exhibit the reverse properties of their corresponding matter particles.
When items of matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate one another in a strong explosion, forsaking solely vitality. The puzzling factor about theories that predict the creation of an equal steadiness of matter and antimatter is that in the event that they had been true, the two would have completely annihilated one another, leaving the universe empty. So there will need to have been extra matter than antimatter at the delivery of the universe, as a result of the universe isn’t empty – it’s filled with stuff that’s fabricated from matter like galaxies, stars and planets. A bit of little bit of antimatter exists round us, however it is extremely uncommon.
Also Read | Indian group proposes radical new technique to settle universe growth dispute
As a physicist engaged on Subaru information, I’m in this so-called matter-antimatter asymmetry drawback. In our current research, my collaborators and I discovered that the telescope’s new measurement of the quantity and kind of helium in faraway galaxies may provide an answer to this long-standing thriller.
After the Big Bang
In the first milliseconds after the Big Bang, the universe was sizzling, dense and filled with elementary particles like protons, neutrons and electrons swimming round in a plasma. Also current in this pool of particles had been neutrinos, that are very tiny, weakly interacting particles, and antineutrinos, their antimatter counterparts.
Physicists imagine that only one second after the Big Bang, the nuclei of sunshine components like hydrogen and helium started to type. This course of is called Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. The nuclei fashioned had been about 75% hydrogen nuclei and 24% helium nuclei, plus small quantities of heavier nuclei.
The physics group’s most generally accepted concept on the formation of those nuclei tells us that neutrinos and antineutrinos performed a elementary function in the creation of, in specific, helium nuclei.
Helium creation in the early universe occurred in a two-step course of. First, neutrons and protons transformed from one to the different in a sequence of processes involving neutrinos and antineutrinos. As the universe cooled, these processes stopped and the ratio of protons to neutrons was set.
As theoretical physicists, we will create fashions to check how the ratio of protons to neutrons will depend on the relative variety of neutrinos and antineutrinos in the early universe. If extra neutrinos had been current, then our fashions present extra protons and fewer neutrons would exist because of this.
As the universe cooled, hydrogen, helium and different components fashioned from these protons and neutrons. Helium is made up of two protons and two neutrons, and hydrogen is only one proton and no neutrons. So the fewer neutrons accessible in the early universe, the much less helium could be produced.
Because the nuclei fashioned throughout Big Bang Nucleosynthesis can nonetheless be noticed in the present day, scientists can infer what number of neutrinos and antineutrinos had been current throughout the early universe. They do that by trying particularly at galaxies which might be wealthy in mild components like hydrogen and helium.
Also Read | A lift for science, a wider window to the universe
A clue in helium
Last 12 months, the Subaru Collaboration – a bunch of Japanese scientists engaged on the Subaru telescope – launched information on 10 galaxies far exterior of our personal which might be virtually solely made up of hydrogen and helium.
Using a method that permits researchers to differentiate totally different components from each other based mostly on the wavelengths of sunshine noticed in the telescope, the Subaru scientists decided precisely how a lot helium exists in every of those 10 galaxies. Importantly, they discovered much less helium than the beforehand accepted concept predicted.
With this new outcome, my collaborators and I labored backward to search out the variety of neutrinos and antineutrinos mandatory to provide the helium abundance discovered in the information. Think again to your ninth grade math class once you had been requested to unravel for “X” in an equation. What my crew did was primarily the extra refined model of that, the place our “X” was the variety of neutrinos or antineutrinos.
Also Read | Euclid house telescope begins quest to check darkish universe
The beforehand accepted concept predicted that there must be the similar variety of neutrinos and antineutrinos in the early universe. However, after we tweaked this concept to give us a prediction that matched the new information set, we discovered that the variety of neutrinos was larger than the variety of antineutrinos.
What does all of it imply?
This evaluation of recent helium-rich galaxy information has a far-reaching consequence – it may be used to elucidate the asymmetry between matter and antimatter. The Subaru information factors us on to a supply for that imbalance: neutrinos. In this research, my collaborators and I proved that this new measurement of helium is according to there being extra neutrinos then antineutrinos in the early universe. Through recognized and sure particle physics processes, the asymmetry in the neutrinos might propagate into an asymmetry in all matter.
The results of our research is a standard kind of outcome in the theoretical physics world. Basically, we found a viable means in which the matter-antimatter asymmetry might have been produced, however that doesn’t imply it positively was produced in that means. The undeniable fact that the information suits with our concept is a touch that the concept we’ve proposed is perhaps the right one, however this truth alone doesn’t imply that it’s.
So, are these tiny little neutrinos the key to answering the age previous query, “Why does anything exist?” According to this new analysis, they simply is perhaps.
Anne-Katherine Burns, Ph.D. Candidate in Theoretical Particle Physics, University of California, Irvine
This article is republished from The Conversation beneath a Creative Commons license. Read the unique article.
