The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has imposed a tremendous and a one-year ban on 4 auditors for alleged skilled misconduct in reference to the audit of branches of Dewan Housing Finance Corp Ltd. (DHFL) in 2017-18.
DHFL (now referred to as Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd.) is a listed entity, owned and managed by Piramal Group.
In 4 separate orders, NFRA levied a tremendous of ₹1 lakh every on auditors – Mathew Samuel, Sam Varghese, Harish Kumar T.Ok. and M. Baskaran. The auditors are companions of audit agency Ok Varghese & Co.
Besides, all of them had been restrained for a interval of one year from endeavor any audit in respect of monetary statements or inner audit of the features and actions of any firm or physique company in the course of the ban interval, the order mentioned.
(*1*) NFRA mentioned.
Following allegations of misappropriation of roughly ₹31,000 crore of public funds, the Enforcement Directorate reported an operation in April 2020 in opposition to alleged financial institution fraud of about ₹3,700 crore by the promoters/administrators of DHFL.
Thereafter, NFRA had suo-motu initiated an Audit Quality Review (AQR) carried out by Chaturvedi & Shah (CAS) agency to probe into the position of the Statutory Auditors of DHFL for the FY 2017-18.
During the assessment, NFRA observed that 33 Engagement Partners (EPs) or department auditors had signed the “Independent Branch Auditors’ Report” for practically 250 branches of DHFL.
Further, NFRA investigated Ok Varghese & Co (the Audit Firm), which was the “Statutory Branch Auditor” of 17 branches of DHFL for FY 2017-18, with Mathew Samuel, Sam Varghese, Harish Kumar T.Ok. and M. Baskaran, as its companions in the agency for the audit of a number of branches of the housing finance firm.
As per the order, NFRA’s investigation revealed that the appointment of none of the 33 department auditors was authorized on the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of DHFL, as required by the Companies Act.
According to NFRA, the auditors additionally portrayed themselves because the “branch statutory auditor” in all communications with the DHFL and CAS, and issued an “Independent Branch Auditors’ Report.”
By doing so the auditors not solely accepted a legally invalid appointment but in addition flouted the provisions of the Chartered Accountants Act (CAs Act), which requires making certain a sound appointment as per the norms.
The regulator additionally investigated the auditors’ compliance with the relevant Standards on Auditing (SAs) in the efficiency of the department audit of DHFL.
It was revealed that the auditors had not complied legal guidelines beneath Standards on Auditing, and had not maintained correct audit documentation and displayed flawed understanding and interpretations of the assorted stipulations in the legislation and requirements in an unprofessional method that established their skilled misconduct in the matter, NFRA mentioned.
