A day after the Centre opposed the Supreme Court’s authorized validation of same-sex marriage, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju mentioned the federal government doesn’t “disturb” the personal freedom and actions of people but the difficulty associated to the institution of marriage is a matter of coverage.
Responding to a query on the Centre’s stand in the highest courtroom, Rijiju mentioned, “The government is not interfering in the personal life, personal activities of anybody. So there should be no confusion. When it comes to an issue related to the institution of marriage, then it is a matter of policy.”
“Personal freedom and personal activities of individuals, of the citizens are never being disturbed, regulated, questioned by the government. You must be very clear about it. There is a clear distinction,” he advised reporters outdoors the Parliament House.
SC on same-sex marriage
The Centre has opposed in the Supreme Court a batch of pleas searching for authorized validation of same-sex marriage, saying it will trigger full havoc with the fragile stability of personal legal guidelines and accepted societal values.
Despite the decriminalisation of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners can not declare a elementary proper for same-sex marriage to be recognised below the legal guidelines of the nation, it mentioned.
State doesn’t recognise non-heterosexual varieties
In its affidavit, the Centre mentioned the institution of marriage between two people of the identical gender is neither recognised nor accepted in any uncodified personal legal guidelines or any codified statutory legal guidelines. The State doesn’t recognise non-heterosexual varieties of marriages or unions or personal understandings of relationships between people in society but the identical will not be illegal, it mentioned.
Later on Monday, the Supreme Court referred the pleas searching for authorized validation of same-sex marriages to a five-judge structure bench for adjudication, saying the difficulty is of “seminal importance”. A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud mentioned the submissions on the difficulty contain an interaction between constitutional rights on the one hand and particular legislative enactments, together with the Special Marriage Act, on the opposite.
Also Read: Same intercourse marriage: 5-judge SC bench to begin listening to from April 18
