Parliament security breach: A day after a serious security breach in Parliament, the Patiala House courtroom sent 4 accused to police remand for seven days on Thursday. This comes after they had been produced earlier than the courtroom by the Delhi Police.
Those who’ve been sent to custody are – Manoranjan D, Sagar Sharma, Neelam Azad and Anmol Shinde. Meanwhile, labelling the security breach as a fallout of a “well-planned conspiracy”, Delhi Police mentioned it was an “attack on the Parliament of India”.
Speaking to the media, Atul Shrivastava, a lawyer for Delhi Police, mentioned {that a} remand of 15 days was requested from the courtroom. “We had requested for 15 days police custody remand which had been considered by the court and the court had been kind enough to grant seven days police custody remand…,” he added.
All accused take frequent accountability
According to police sources, the 4 accused are reportedly mentioned to have been giving “rote answers” to the investigation group of the Delhi Police Special Cell within the matter. All the accused have taken frequent accountability for the security breach incident within the Lok Sabha throughout police interrogation, they added.
Earlier, the absconding accused within the Parliament Security breach case Lalit Jha was suspected to be the mastermind of the complete conspiracy. However, Police officers say this facet will turn out to be clear solely when the Police apprehend Lalit Jha.
What did council for police say?
During the proceedings in courtroom, the counsel for the police submitted, “The accused carried a pamphlet that showed and declared Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a missing person, adding whoever finds him would be paid a cash reward from the Swiss bank. The accused projected the PM as a proclaimed offender.”
The police acknowledged of their plea that the accused wanted to be taken to Lucknow, Mumbai and Mysore for custodial interrogation. “We need them to take to Lucknow, Mumbai and Mysore since we need their custodial interrogation,” Delhi Police acknowledged in its plea.
Parliament security breach
The security breach occurred on the twenty second anniversary of the 2001 terror assault on the Parliament. Two individuals, Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D, jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the general public gallery throughout Zero Hour, launched a yellow gasoline from canisters and shouted slogans earlier than being overpowered by some MPs.
A case was registered towards the accused beneath a number of related sections of the Indian Penal Code and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in reference to the incident. A case beneath Sections 120-B (prison conspiracy), 452 (trespassing), Section 153 (need solely giving provocation with an intent to trigger riot), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public features), 353 (assault or prison pressure to deter public servants from the discharge of his obligation) of the IPC was additionally registered within the matter.
(With inputs from companies)
ALSO READ: PM Modi asks ministers to take Parliament security breach incident critically: Sources
(*4*)Source hyperlink