Union Minister Rajeev claims that focus of the advisory is on untested AI platforms supposed for deployment on the Indian Internet.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar has introduced a slew of clarifications to the AI advisory by the Ministry of Electronics and IT, Government of India, printed on March 1.
In a observe-as much as the current advisory issued by MeitY on March 1, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, the Minister of State for IT, has clarified essential points of the advisory amid business-broad considerations.
Chandrasekhar emphasised that the advisory particularly targets “Significant platforms and permission seeking from Meity is only for large plarforms and will not apply to startups.” He acknowledged that the main focus of the advisory is on “untested AI platforms” supposed for deployment on the “Indian Internet.”
Recent advisory of @GoI_MeitY must be understood➡️Advisory is aimed on the Significant platforms and permission in search of from Meity is just for massive plarforms and won’t apply to startups.
➡️Advisory is aimed toward untested AI platforms from deploying on Indian Internet…
— Rajeev Chandrasekhar (@Rajeev_GoI) March 4, 2024
Furthermore, he underscored that the advisory serves as an “insurance policy” for platforms, defending them from potential client lawsuits. To guarantee compliance, acquiring permission and clearly labeling, in addition to acquiring consent for disclosing untested platforms to customers, is essential.
“Safety & Trust of India’s Internet is a shared and common goal for Govt, users and Platforms,” he concluded.
For these unfamiliar, the Ministry of Electronics and IT, Government of India, issued an advisory on March 1 addressing platforms utilising generative AI fashions and algorithms. The advisory emphasises the need for these platforms to ask “explicit permission of the government of India” earlier than they’re launched in India. Moreover, the businesses ought to be certain that their fashions shouldn’t “host, display, upload, modify, publish, transmit, store, update or share any unlawful content,” and that “Non-compliance with provisions would result in penal consequences.”
This was preceded by a controversial transfer by Google’s Gemini generative AI platform, whereby it was alleged to be biased when requested a question about Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.