It’s a significant blow to Adani Total Gas Ltd as its application for a license to retail CNG to vehicles and piped gas to family kitchens in Noida has been rejected by the oil regulator Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB). The regulator in an order stated that the corporate doesn’t fulfill the necessities of the regulation and so its application is rejected.
Adani has been eyeing a city gas distribution (CGD) license for cities adjoining the nationwide capital for almost 20 years now. A agency can retail CNG or piped pure gas in a city solely whether it is authorised by the regulator or had permission from the central authorities previous to the regulator coming into existence.
While Indraprastha Gas Ltd – the three way partnership of state-owned companies – had been authorised for the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Adani has challenged IGL’s declare for adjoining cities. PNGRB, which got here into being in 2006, accepted city gas authorisations given to corporations by the central authorities previous to its existence.
IGL, which had been retailing CNG within the NCT of Delhi for the reason that late Nineteen Nineties as per the orders of the Supreme Court and the union authorities, was given a city gas license. The agency additionally bought the identical for Noida in Uttar Pradesh citing an April 8, 2004 authorisation letter from the central authorities. IGL has been retailing CNG to vehicles and piped pure gas to family kitchens and industries in Noida for over one-and-a-half a long time now.
Adani Energy Ltd (AEL), which later started Adani Total Gas Ltd (ATGL) after French power large TotalEnergies took a stake within the firm, on June 25, 2008, claimed authorisation for the event of a city or native pure gas distribution community (CGD community) for the geographical space (GA) of Noida.
The regulator couldn’t course of the application on the time of its submission and the problem of authorisation for Noida went to Supreme Court. The apex court docket in September final yr disposed of a petition saying the regulator was free to proceed in deciding on the dispute. Thereafter, PNGRB started processing the Adani application. It rejected Adani’s application with two out of the three adjudicating members voting for that. A 3rd member, Ajit Kumar Pande, Member (Legal), opined that it was not prudent for PNGRB to go an order because the case was sub-judice since Adani had filed an application with appellate tribunal APTEL.
(with inputs from PTI)
