On September 13 2013, speleologists Rick Hunter and Steven Tucker descended deep into South Africa’s Rising Star cave system and found the first evidence of a rare assemblage of hominin fossils.
To date, the stays of greater than 15 people belonging to a beforehand unknown species of extinct human, dubbed Homo naledi, have been present in the cave. These short-statured, small-brained historical cousins are thought to have lived in Southern Africa between 335,000 and 241,000 years in the past.
Rising Star Cave is an distinctive useful resource for exploring the origins of our species. However, archaeological work at the web site has been a few of the most controversial in the self-discipline.
Also Read | World’s oldest-known burial web site present in South Africa
Three new research made obtainable as we speak (as pre-prints awaiting peer evaluation) declare to have discovered evidence Homo naledi deliberately buried their lifeless (a complicated observe we often affiliate with Homo sapiens) and made rock art, which suggests superior cognitive talents.
However, as archaeologists who examine early people in Africa, we’re not satisfied the new analysis stacks up.
Did Homo naledi bury their lifeless?
The analysis purports to have evidence Homo naledi undertook deliberate burial of their lifeless – a significant declare.
So far, the earliest safe evidence for burial in Africa comes from the Panga ya Saidi cave web site in jap Kenya, excavated by our crew and dated to 78,000 years in the past. This burial of a Homo sapiens little one meets rigorous standards agreed upon by the scientific neighborhood for figuring out intentional human burial.
The purpose of the standards is to assist differentiate burial from different practices and phenomena that would result in the depositing of human stays. These embrace, for instance, the pure accumulation of skeletal elements in a predator’s cavern, or the form of carrying and defending of lifeless our bodies noticed amongst cognitively superior non-human species comparable to gorillas and chimpanzees.
Also Read | Humans had been utilizing fireplace in Europe 50,000 years sooner than we thought
The claimed Homo naledi burials precede the Panga ya Saidi burial evidence by as a lot as 160,000 years. If the declare is appropriate, it considerably pushes again evidence for superior mortuary behaviour in Africa. It additionally implies intentional burial wasn’t restricted to our species or different big-brained hominins.
Such a discovering would drive us to rethink the function of mind measurement in superior “meaning-making” cognition, in addition to what distinguishes our species from our ancestors.
But is there truly evidence for funerary behaviour at Rising Star Cave? According to requirements set by the palaeoanthropology neighborhood, the evidence offered thus far signifies no.
Insufficient evidence
The web site’s researchers declare to have evidence for 3 intentional burials.
However, not considered one of the burials offers compelling evidence of a intentionally excavated pit. Indeed, the shallow cavities is probably not dug pits in any respect, however pure depressions the place the our bodies accrued and had been later disturbed by trampling, or partial cave collapse.
The alleged burials additionally fail to fulfill one other basic standards for deliberate burials: anatomical alignment of the physique and articulation of skeletal stays.
In a deliberate burial, the physique is mostly intact and any minimal displacement might be defined by decomposition. That’s as a result of burial entails instantly masking the physique with soil, which protects the anatomical integrity of the skeleton.
Also Read | Early people lived in northern India 80,000 years in the past
Rising Star Cave thus far hasn’t produced evidence for something apart from the common spatial affiliation of some skeletal components. At most, it offers evidence for the in-situ decomposition of specific physique elements, comparable to an ankle, and partial hand and foot articulations.
Moreover, confirming intentional burial in the previous has required the presentation of human stays in an association that may’t have been achieved by probability. However, the scattered distribution of the stays at Rising Star prevents reconstruction of their unique positions.
Other claimed evidence for funerary behaviour is equally uncompelling. A stone artefact supposedly included in the burial as a “grave good” is claimed to have scratches and edge serrations from use. But this so-called artefact’s form suggests it could be pure. It’s nonetheless encased in sediment and has solely been studied by synchrotron X-ray.
But maybe the largest barrier to confirming the standing of the findings is that thus far none of the alleged burials have been absolutely excavated. It’s subsequently unattainable to evaluate the completeness of the our bodies, their unique place, and the limits of the purported pits.
Did Homo naledi make rock art?
An equally splashy declare made in considered one of the publications is that Homo naledi left rock art on the partitions of Rising Star Cave.
The report describes engravings in the type of deeply impressed cross-hatchings and geometric shapes comparable to squares, triangles, crosses and X’s. Further claims are made about the preparation of and potential repeated dealing with or rubbing of the related rock floor, and the use of an analogous “tool” to the one they declare was discovered with the alleged burial.
Explained | Does palaeogenomics clarify our origins?
This declare has main implications. To date, rock art has solely reliably been linked to Homo sapiens and, in rarer circumstances, a few of our large-brained ancestors. Similar to deliberate burial, producing rock art has main implications for the cognitive talents of a species. It denotes a capability for illustration, and the creation and communication of that means through summary symbols.
The downside with the rock art at Rising Star Cave is that it’s undated. To suggest any hyperlink with Homo naledi requires agency dates. This might be achieved by utilizing relationship strategies on related residues or pure deposits masking the art, or by finding out supplies from excavated and dated archaeological layers that may be linked to the art (as an illustration, in the event that they include engraving instruments or engraved rock fall fragments).
In the absence of relationship, it’s merely spurious to assert the engravings had been made by Homo naledi, fairly than by one other species (and probably at a a lot later date).
Did Homo naledi mild up Rising Star Cave?
The researchers additionally declare the mortuary and engraving actions in Rising Star Cave concerned strategic use of fireplace for illumination.
In public lectures and on social media they make clear they’ve discovered new evidence for hearths, together with charcoal, ash, discoloured clay and burned animal bones. Yet none of the scientific analysis wanted to substantiate the use of fireplace has been carried out. Or if it has, it hasn’t been printed.
Previously acquired radiocarbon dates obtained by the web site investigators on the obvious fireplace materials supplied very late dates that distanced the hearths from the stays of Homo naledi by a number of hundred thousand years.
We’re not against the concept that the Rising Star Cave witnessed precocious mortuary behaviour involving the intentional disposal of our bodies by Homo naledi. But it’s clear the newest inferences require additional investigation earlier than they’re accepted by the broader scientific neighborhood.
Michael Petraglia is director, Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University. Emmanuel Okay. Ndiema is senior analysis scientist, National Museums of Kenya. María Martinón-Torres is CENIEH Director, Atapuerca Research Team, Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH). Nicole Boivin is professor, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology.
