New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticised the criticism of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and the requires reverting to poll papers, stating that the electoral course of in India is a “humongous task,” and efforts shouldn’t be made to “bring down the system.”
The apex courtroom additionally recalled cases of polling cubicles being captured within the period of poll papers to control election outcomes.
The high courtroom was listening to a batch of pleas in search of full cross-verification of the votes solid utilizing EVMs with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT), an impartial vote verification system that allows an elector to see whether or not his vote was solid appropriately.
The bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta criticised the argument suggesting that many European international locations have reverted to poll papers after experimenting with voting machines.
Here’s what Supreme Court mentioned
“This is a humongous task. No European country can do this. You talked about Germany but what is the population there. My home state West Bengal is far more populous than Germany. We have to repose faith and trust in the electoral process. Don’t try to bring down the system like this,” Justice Datta informed advocate Prashant Bhushan, showing for NGO ‘Association for Democratic Reforms’.
Bhushan advocated for a return to poll papers, citing the instance of Germany.
The bench mentioned there have been roughly 98 crore registered voters in India. “There will be some mismatch in vote count due to some human errors but it can be countered and checked,” it mentioned.
‘Human intervention in a course of creates issues’
Justice Khanna, whereas referring to sales space capturing up to now, mentioned, “Mr. Bhushan, we are all in our 60s. We have seen what used to happen earlier when there were no EVMs. We don’t need to tell you.” Bhushan clarified that he wasn’t casting aspersions on the Election Commission or alleging manipulation of EVMs. He emphasised his concern that these polling machines might doubtlessly be tampered with.
Justice Khanna identified to Bhushan that human intervention in a course of creates issues together with bias, whereas machines, when left to function with out improper human interference, are likely to operate appropriately and supply correct outcomes.
The bench directed a collection of inquiries to the Election Commission officers current within the courtroom concerning the functioning of EVMs, their storage procedures, and the potential for information manipulation. “We want you to apprise us of each and every detail from point A to Z on the EVMs, right from their assembling to storage after the counting of votes,” the bench informed senior advocate Maninder Singh, showing for the Election Commission.
Bhushan mentioned he additionally needs that each voter must be allowed to gather the paper slip of his vote solid from the VVPAT machine and drop it into the poll field. He additionally sought a reversal of the ballot panel’s determination to exchange the clear glass on VVPAT machines with an opaque glass by way of which a voter can see the slip solely when the sunshine is on for seven seconds.
He alleged that two public sector undertakings–Bharat Electronic Ltd and Electronics Corporation of India Ltd (ECILL)–have as its administrators people who find themselves related to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.
The bench requested Singh whether or not it’s potential to topic EVMs to technical analysis to rule out any foul play after the counting of votes is over.
Singh urged the courtroom to not point out any such factor with out listening to the ballot panel on the difficulty as it could create pointless confusion. “Don’t be apprehensive. We are not indicating any such thing but are only soliciting a response,” Justice Khanna informed Singh.
Heraing to renew on April 18
The bench additionally requested the ballot panel to apprise it in regards to the punishment prescribed below the regulation for somebody who manipulates EVMs. “If some manipulation is done, then what is the consequence? What is the punishment prescribed under the law? Tell us. This is a very serious thing because there should be some fear of the consequences,” the courtroom informed Singh.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, showing for activist Arun Kumar Agrawal, who has sought an entire depend of VVPAT slips in polls, submitted there shouldn’t be even an iota of doubt in regards to the electoral course of and the Election Commission ought to be sure that.
He claimed after the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, a parliamentary committee had discovered discrepancies in EVM information however the Election Commission by no means responded to the panel. “There are very high chances of error. We always blame the population for everything including the number of cases clogging our judicial system. We should focus on the system so that there is no iota of doubt in the mind of even a single voter,” he mentioned.
During the almost two-hour-long listening to, a number of advocates showing for various petitioners addressed the courtroom, with some suggesting use of bar codes to cut back probabilities of manipulation of EVMs. One of them claimed battle of curiosity on half of members of the technical committee of the election fee, saying they had been the inventors and designers of the EVMs.
The listening to remained inconclusive and would resume on April 18.
The seven-phase Lok Sabha polls will start on April 19.
The ADR has sought matching the depend in EVMs with votes which have been verifiably “recorded as cast” and to make sure that the voter is ready to confirm by way of VVPAT slip that his vote, as recorded on the paper slip, has been “counted as recorded”.
(With PTI inputs)
Also Read: Supreme Court seeks Election Commission reply on plea for full depend of VVPAT slips
