The Supreme Court on December 11 will pronounce its verdict on a batch of petitions difficult the abrogation of Article 370 and bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories. The Constitution bench of the Supreme Court will give its judgement on a batch of petitions difficult the abrogation of Article 370 and bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories. A five-judge structure bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant handed the judgement.
Earlier, earlier than the decision, Congress chief Ravinder Sharma had mentioned that persons are anticipating lots from the Apex Court. Ravinder Sharma instructed ANI “People are expecting a lot from the Supreme Court and we believe that the SC will rightly uphold the Constitution and the sentiments of the people. All rights of the Jammu Kashmir people which were protected earlier regarding land and jobs, were taken away. The state was divided into two UTs. Elections have not been held for the last five and a half years. People demand early elections and restoration of statehood. We can only comment after the judgement comes. We respect the rule of law.”
Meanwhile, Sunil Dimple, chief of the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Conference has mentioned that the choice which is able to come at this time can be written in golden letters whereas Amit Raina, of the NGO Roots in Kashmir has expressed his confidence that the Court is not going to carry again this Article.
On September 5, the apex courtroom reserved the judgement after listening to the arguments for 16 days. The central authorities had defended its resolution to abrogate Article 370, saying there was no “constitutional fraud” in repealing the availability that accorded particular standing to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared for Centre.
The Centre had instructed the bench that Jammu and Kashmir was not the one state whose accession to India was by devices of accession, however many different princely states that too had joined India post-independence in 1947, with conditionality and after their merger, their sovereignty was subsumed within the sovereignty of India.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing on behalf of the petitioners, had opened the arguments, saying Article 370 was now not a “temporary provision” and had assumed permanence submit the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir. He had contended that the Parliament couldn’t have declared itself to be the legislature of J-Ok to facilitate the abrogation of Article 370, as Article 354 of the Constitution doesn’t authorise such an train of energy.
The Central authorities had defended its resolution to abolish Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, saying that after the adjustments, avenue violence, which was engineered and orchestrated by terrorists and secessionist networks, has now develop into a factor of the previous. On August 5, 2019, the Central authorities introduced the revocation of the particular standing of Jammu and Kashmir granted beneath Article 370 and cut up the area into two union territories.Â
Mehbooba Mufti, Omar Abdullah Under House Arrest? LG Manoj Sinha Says This
Amid studies of senior political leaders, together with two former chief ministers Mehbooba Mufti and Omar Abdullah, being put beneath home arrest, LG Manoj Sinha, dismissing the claims mentioned, “This is totally baseless. No one has been put under house arrest or arrested due to political reasons in J&K. It is an attempt to spread rumours.”
Â
#WATCH | On studies of J&Ok leaders put beneath home arrest forward of SC verdict on abrogation of Art 370, LG Manoj Sinha says, “This is totally baseless. No one has been put under house arrest or arrested due to political reasons in J&K. It is an attempt to spread rumours.” pic.twitter.com/CHvRh28Pu1
— ANI (@ANI) December 11, 2023
Security Tightened Across Jammu & Kashmir
With the decision awaited, safety throughout J& Ok has been tightened.Â
Article 370 verdict LIVE updates: Three judgements to be delivered
The Supreme Court’s five-judge constitutional bench can be delivering three verdicts in whole revolving across the abrogation of Article 370.Â
Â
CJI DY Chandrachud says there are three judgements within the matter. https://t.co/amdOyDy2Gr
— ANI (@ANI) December 11, 2023
SC Verdict On Article 370
According to ANI, CJI DY Chandrachud says, “Every decision taken by Union on behalf of State is not subject to challenge …this will lead to chaos and uncertainty and would bring the administration of the State to a standstill…” It added, “Supreme Court says the argument of petitioners that the Union government cannot take actions of irreversible consequences in the State during Presidential rule is not acceptable.”
‘J&Ok grew to become an integral a part of India as evidenced from Articles 1 and 370 of the Constitution of India’
Supreme Court says it has held that Article 370 is a short lived provision. The apex courtroom additionally says it holds that Jammu and Kashmir didn’t retain a component of inside sovereignty after it acceded to India. Supreme Court holds that Jammu and Kashmir grew to become an integral a part of India as evidenced from Articles 1 and 370 of the Constitution of India. “Supreme Court holds that Article 370 was an interim arrangement due to war conditions in the State. Textual reading also indicates that Article 370 is a temporary provision,” says CJI studying out the judgment, as per ANI.
Article 370:Â President Can Declare Article 370 Ceases To Exist
Supreme Court says Article 370 was meant for the constitutional integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the Union and it was not for disintegration, and the President can declare that Article 370 ceases to exist. Supreme Court holds that the ability of the President to subject a notification that Article 370 ceases to exist subsists even after the dissolution of the J&Ok Constituent Assembly.Â
Omar Abdullah Hits Out At LG
“Dear Mr LG these chains that have been put on my gate have not been put by me so why are you denying what your police force has done. It’s also possible you don’t even know what your police is doing? Which one is it? Are you being dishonest or is your police acting independent of you?” Omar posted on X.
Â
Dear Mr LG these chains which were placed on my gate haven’t been put by me so why are you denying what your police power has accomplished. It’s additionally doable you don’t even know what your police is doing? Which one is it? Are you being dishonest or is your police appearing impartial of… https://t.co/HFr2bLr7EP pic.twitter.com/b4Xye8RnoJ
— Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) December 11, 2023
Article 370 Verdict:Â SC upholds validity of Presidential order
“Supreme Court says no maladies in exercise of power under Article 370(3) by President to issue August 2019 order. Thus, we hold the exercise of Presidential power to be valid,” the Supreme Court talked about.
Article 370 Verdict: CJI Says This
– We direct that restoration of statehood in Union Territory of J&Ok shall be accomplished on the earliest, says CJI.
– CJI says ‘We maintain train of presidential energy to subject constitutional order abrogating Article 370 of Constitution as legitimate’
Decision To Carve Out UT Of Ladakh From J&Ok Valid: CJI
“We uphold the validity of the decision to carve Union Territory of Ladakh out of Jammu and Kashmir,” says CJI
