Sushil Kumar arrested: Wrestler sent to six-day police custody in murder case | Other Sports News

By
vipulpatil40
-
0
66


New Delhi: A Delhi court docket sent Olympic medallist Sushil Kumar to six days police custody on Sunday for interrogation in reference to the killing of a fellow wrestler, saying the allegations in opposition to him are severe in nature and that nobody is above the regulation.

Kumar and his associates allegedly assaulted wrestler Sagar Dhankar (23) and two of his pals, Sonu and Amit Kumar, on the Chhatrasal stadium in New Delhi on the intervening evening of May 4 and 5. Sagar succumbed to the accidents later. Kumar was arrested together with co-accused Ajay from outer Delhi’s Mundka on Sunday. The two-time Olympic medallist was on the run for practically three weeks.

Metropolitan Magistrate Divya Malhotra allowed the custodial interrogation of Kumar, who was produced earlier than the court docket by the police, which sought 12 days of custody to quiz him.

Allowing the police to interrogate Kumar for six days, the Justice of the Peace mentioned, “No one is above law and law treats everyone equally. Our Constitution guarantees the right to life and liberty to all persons subject to exceptions. The allegations against the accused persons are grave in nature.” 

The court docket famous that the involvement of numerous folks, together with members of infamous gangs from exterior Delhi, is suspected in the case and they’re but to be arrested.

“The CCTV installed at the place of incident has allegedly been tampered with and there is no sign of its DVR. All these points require a detailed investigation by the police. As such, in the interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to allow the application to the extent of six days,” the Justice of the Peace mentioned.

During the course of the proceedings, Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Shrivastava advised the court docket that Kumar’s custodial interrogation was required to unearth the conspiracy and motive behind the crime. He mentioned the weapon used in the fee of crime, Kumar’s cell phone, SIM playing cards and the garments he wore through the brawl have to be recovered. 

Also Read | The downfall of Sushil Kumar: From Olympic champion to a murder accused  

A hire settlement supposedly executed between the spouse of the accused and one of many victims, Sonu, can be to be recovered, he added.

Shrivastava mentioned the arrest of the opposite accused in the case has to be made and their particular function and Kumar’s affiliation with any gang of criminals even have to be ascertained.

“He (Kumar) has to be taken to the scene of crime. He was the Officer on Special Duty (OSD) of the stadium and its cameras were found to be dismantled. He took away the DVR, which has to be recovered,” the extra public prosecutor advised the court docket, searching for Kumar’s custody.

“No one is above the law. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. We just have these initial days to prove the case. We need to take him to different places, even outside Delhi, by following COVID-19 guidelines,” he mentioned.

Kumar’s counsel Vikram Singh Jhakar opposed the remand utility and argued that his shopper’s custodial interrogation is just not required because the police have already made recoveries in the case.
He mentioned Kumar is a celebrated wrestler and never some infamous prison who might flee from justice. 

Related | Mixed feelings in Indian sports activities after Delhi Police pin Olympic champion in murder case 

“Rather, he has clean antecedents and has been falsely implicated in the case only to extort money. Moreover, both the accused are ready to cooperate in the investigation,” Kumar’s lawyer advised the court docket.

The Delhi Police lodged an FIR in the case underneath sections 302 (murder), 308 (culpable murder), 365 (kidnapping), 325 (inflicting grievous harm), 323 (voluntarily inflicting harm), 341 (wrongful restraint) and 506 (prison intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The FIR was additionally registered underneath sections 188 (disobedience to order by public servant), 269 (negligent act possible to unfold an infection of illness), 120B (prison conspiracy) and 34 (widespread intention) of the IPC and numerous sections of the Arms Act. 





Source hyperlink