UPSC Results 2023: UPSC (The Union Public Service Commission) declared the outcomes of 2022 examinations on May 23 however even after 3 days it’s in the information. In weird turns of occasions, 4 aspirants of two identical names- Aysha and Tushar got here out claiming handed on two roll numbers. Aysha Makrani and Tushar who fraudulently claimed that they’ve been lastly really helpful by the Commission in the civil providers examination 2022 in opposition to two roll numbers of genuinely really helpful candidates, UPSC stated on Friday.
“The claims of both persons are fake. They have forged the documents in their favour to buttress their claims,” stated the assertion issued on Friday.
By doing so, each Makrani and Tushar have acted in contravention of the provisions of the Rules of the Civil Services Examination, 2022 notified by the authorities of India (Department of Personnel and Training), it stated.
Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of the Examination Rules, the UPSC is considering each felony in addition to disciplinary penal motion in opposition to the two candidates for his or her fraudulent acts, the assertion stated.
“The system of the UPSC is robust as well as foolproof and such errors are not possible,” it added.
The UPSC conducts civil providers examination yearly in three phases — preliminary, important and interview — to choose officers of Indian Administrative Service (IAS), Indian Foreign Service (IFS) and Indian Police Service (IPS), amongst others.
Aysha case
Sharing particulars, the Commission stated Aysha Makrani, daughter of Salimmuddin Makrani, who’s claiming her ultimate advice by the UPSC, is discovered to have cast the paperwork in her favour.
Her precise roll quantity is 7805064. She appeared in the preliminary examination held on June 5, 2022 and scored solely 22.22 marks in General Studies Paper-I and 21.09 marks in General Studies Paper-II, it stated.
“As per the requirement of Examination Rules, she was required to score at least 66 marks in Paper-II. She has not only failed to qualify in Paper-II but scored far less marks than the cut-off marks of Paper-I, which were 88.22 for unreserved category for the preliminary examination of the year 2022,” the UPSC stated.
Hence, Aysha Makrani has failed at the stage of the preliminary examination itself and couldn’t transfer additional in subsequent phases of the examination, it added.
On the different hand, Ayasha Fatima, daughter of Naziruddin, bearing roll quantity 7811744, is the real candidate who has been really helpful by the UPSC, securing 184th rank in the ultimate results of the civil providers examination, 2022, the assertion stated.
Tushar case
Similarly, in case of Tushar, son of Brijmohan from Rewari in Haryana, he had utilized for the civil providers (preliminary) examination, 2022 and was allotted roll quantity 2208860 for this examination. He appeared in the preliminary examination and scored minus 22.89 (i.e.-22.89) marks in General Studies Paper-I and 44.73 marks in General Studies Paper-II, the UPSC stated. As per the requirement of Examination Rules, he was required to rating at the very least 66 marks in Paper-II, it stated.
Thus, even Tushar has failed at the stage of the preliminary examination itself and couldn’t transfer additional in subsequent phases of the examination, the Commission added.
“On the other hand, it is confirmed that Tushar Kumar, son of Ashwini Kumar Singh, bearing roll number 1521306, of state of Bihar is the genuine candidate, who has been recommended by the UPSC at 44th rank,” the assertion stated.
The Commission stated each these instances have been reported in the digital/print media extensively. “One of such media channels has irresponsibly reported that the UPSC has corrected its mistake in one of the above two cases and investigating the matter as to how such error has happened,” it stated.
Many different media channels and social media portals have additionally carried the information with none verification, the assertion stated, including that it was unprofessional on the a part of the stated media channel.
UPSC on its system
“It is reiterated that the UPSC’s system is robust and foolproof to eliminate any such errors of alleged nature. It is expected of the media channels that they verify the genuineness of such claims from the UPSC before broadcasting/publishing news of such fake claims through their print/media channels,” it stated.
(With PTI inputs)
